From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Antonino A. Daplas" Subject: Re: [atyfb] No display on Sparc Ultra 10 with kernel 2.6.10-rc2 or later Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 19:27:57 +0800 Message-ID: <200502161927.58344.adaplas@hotpop.com> References: <200502140251.00645.aragorn@tiscali.nl> <200502152010.22880.adaplas@hotpop.com> <200502160327.47586.aragorn@tiscali.nl> Reply-To: adaplas@pol.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: <200502160327.47586.aragorn@tiscali.nl> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: sparclinux-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: , adaplas@pol.net Cc: debian-sparc@lists.debian.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, Linux Fbdev development list On Wednesday 16 February 2005 10:27, Frans Pop wrote: > On Tuesday 15 February 2005 13:10, Antonino A. Daplas wrote: > > Can you verify if this is the case? Insert a bunch of printk's in and > > around this line "if (node == pcp->prom_node) {" in > > atyfb_setup_sparc(). For the 2.6.8 kernel, this line is in > > atyfb_init(). > > Tested that and output is identical for both. That condition you cite is > true for both kernels and the resolutions are retrieved from prom: > atyfb (fjp): crtc.vxres 1152 > atyfb (fjp): crtc.vyres 900 > > > As a workaround, a boot option can be added for csync, hsync and vsync. > > Hmm. I looked for the syntax for that, but can't find it. > I tried > video=atyfb:1024x768@70,csync:1 > and > video=atyfb:1024x768@70,csync:high > but both failed miserably. > (I have checked that csync is sufficient to activate the monitor.) Nope, those are proposed options. If nobody disagrees, I can easily add this for atyfb. Tony