From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Frans Pop Subject: Re: [atyfb] No display on Sparc Ultra 10 with kernel 2.6.10-rc2 or later Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 23:10:03 +0100 Message-ID: <200502162310.12703.aragorn@tiscali.nl> References: <200502140251.00645.aragorn@tiscali.nl> <200502161927.58344.adaplas@hotpop.com> <20050216075140.77ae3563.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart6563438.3IMlraUbTm"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: <20050216075140.77ae3563.davem@davemloft.net> Resent-Message-ID: List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive: To: "David S. Miller" Cc: adaplas@pol.net, debian-sparc@lists.debian.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-fbdev-devel@lists.sourceforge.net --nextPart6563438.3IMlraUbTm Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Wednesday 16 February 2005 16:51, David S. Miller wrote: > On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 19:27:57 +0800 Antonino A. Daplas wrote: > > Nope, those are proposed options. If nobody disagrees, I can easily > > add this for atyfb. > > Please do. > > BTW, for Sparc we may wish to inherit the CSYNC setting from > default_var. Sounds like a nice idea. If you have a patch that you would like to have tested, feel free to mail=20 me. Cheers, =46JP --nextPart6563438.3IMlraUbTm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCE8TEgm/Kwh6ICoQRAh76AJ96bEvDhaPTTgPllsNlDDqaV8SYhQCgqQc4 /7EOhAx+wKOn0tNiE3vTWM0= =wdrf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart6563438.3IMlraUbTm--