From: "Randy.Dunlap" <rddunlap@osdl.org>
To: linux-fbdev-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: miles.lane@gmail.com, adaplas@hotpop.com, akpm@osdl.org, adaplas@pol.net
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH 1/6] nvidiafb: ioremap and i2c fixes
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 07:51:53 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050425075153.3f4ca6c0.rddunlap@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a44ae5cd0504242236365088ba@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, 24 Apr 2005 22:36:42 -0700 Miles Lane wrote:
| On 4/24/05, Randy.Dunlap <rddunlap@osdl.org> wrote:
| > On Mon, 25 Apr 2005 11:21:20 +0800 Antonino A. Daplas wrote:
| >
| > | On Sunday 24 April 2005 08:40, Andrew Morton wrote:
| > | > "Antonino A. Daplas" <adaplas@hotpop.com> wrote:
| > | > > - Add 'vram' option to specify amount of video RAM to remap
| > | > > - Limit remap size to 128 MIB
| > | >
| > | > Am I right in believing that if someone has a 256MB card and doesn't know
| > | > about the `vram' option, their card will fail to work, because the 128MB
| > | > vmalloc() will fail?
| > | >
| > |
| > | I thought that a 128MiB vmalloc will work.
| >
| > The default vmalloc total size is 128 MB, but the kernel always
| > requires a "guard page", which cannot be allocated, so the
| > total allocation fails.
| >
| > I tried to make a patch that sets the default vmalloc total size
| > to 128 MB + PAGE_SIZE, but Miles reported that the driver's
| > vmalloc() call still failed...
|
| Which seems to beg a couple of questions:
| How much memory is _really_ trying to get allocated when I boot
| with no vmalloc argument. Does this point to some problem in
| the nvidiafb code? Does the fact that specifying vmalloc=128M
| does not fix the problem indicate that something about my video
| card won't work with less than 256Mb vmalloced, or is this a
| driver issue?
or simply that some other code is also vmalloc-ing some memory,
so that nvidiafb's request can't succeed due to that?
You could go back to the very first test patch that I sent
to you to see if other vmalloc's are happening. I don't recall
the result of that one, but it seems like it was "Nope."
---
~Randy
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-04-25 14:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-04-16 5:13 [PATCH 1/6] nvidiafb: ioremap and i2c fixes Antonino A. Daplas
2005-04-24 0:40 ` Andrew Morton
2005-04-25 3:21 ` Antonino A. Daplas
2005-04-25 5:00 ` Andrew Morton
2005-04-25 5:03 ` Randy.Dunlap
2005-04-25 5:36 ` Miles Lane
2005-04-25 14:51 ` Randy.Dunlap [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050425075153.3f4ca6c0.rddunlap@osdl.org \
--to=rddunlap@osdl.org \
--cc=adaplas@hotpop.com \
--cc=adaplas@pol.net \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-fbdev-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=miles.lane@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).