linux-fbdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: linux-fbdev-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: adaplas@gmail.com, Knut_Petersen@t-online.de
Subject: Re: Fw: framebuffer blitting performance loss  2.6.12 -> 2.6.13-rc3
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 00:17:35 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050729001735.5934622f.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200507221158.23454.adaplas@gmail.com>

"Antonino A. Daplas" <adaplas@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Friday 15 July 2005 18:39, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Begin forwarded message:
> >
> > Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2005 12:14:37 +0200
> > From: Knut Petersen <Knut_Petersen@t-online.de>
> > To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> > Subject: framebuffer blitting performance loss  2.6.12 -> 2.6.13-rc3
> >
> >
> > Hi everybody!
> >
> > There is a serious performance loss between 2.6.12 and 2.6.13-rc3
> > affecting _all_ framebuffer devices, especially those with fast
> > bitblit functions.
> >
> 
> I haven't seen any significant performance penalty, between 2.6.12-rc5-mm1
> and 2.6.13-rc3-mm1.
> 
> Based on your results, I would pinpoint the culprit to be in
> video/console/bitblit.c.  However, the changes there are minor, and should not
> alter the peformance.
> 

So.. what happened here?  Is the problem still present in 2.6.13-rc4?


-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September
19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA
Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf

  reply	other threads:[~2005-07-29  7:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-07-15 10:39 Fw: framebuffer blitting performance loss 2.6.12 -> 2.6.13-rc3 Andrew Morton
2005-07-22  3:58 ` Antonino A. Daplas
2005-07-29  7:17   ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2005-07-29 14:54     ` Knut Petersen
2005-07-29 15:42       ` Antonino A. Daplas
2005-07-29 19:02         ` Andrew Morton
2005-07-29 19:52           ` James Simmons
2005-07-29 19:59           ` James Simmons
2005-07-29 19:51         ` James Simmons
2005-07-29 20:21           ` Jon Smirl
2005-07-29 22:45             ` Antonino A. Daplas
2005-08-03 17:29               ` James Simmons
2005-07-29 22:45           ` Luca
2005-07-29 20:10         ` Knut Petersen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050729001735.5934622f.akpm@osdl.org \
    --to=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=Knut_Petersen@t-online.de \
    --cc=adaplas@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-fbdev-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).