From: Ingo Oeser <ioe-lkml@rameria.de>
To: "Antonino A. Daplas" <adaplas@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Linux Fbdev development list
<linux-fbdev-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
Linux Kernel Development <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] VT binding: Update fbcon to support binding
Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2006 13:10:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200606101310.04174.ioe-lkml@rameria.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <448933EB.3070003@gmail.com>
Hi Antonio,
On Friday, 9. June 2006 10:40, Antonino A. Daplas wrote:
> 5. When fbcon is completely unbound from the console layer, fbcon will
> also release (iow, decrement module reference counts to zero) all fbdev
> drivers. In other words, a bind or unbind request from the console layer
> will propagate down to the framebuffer drivers.
>
> 6. If fbcon is not bound to the console, it will ignore all notifier
> events (except driver registration and unregistration) and all sysfs
> requests.
Wow!
Now one can:
- implement different framebuffer drivers for a chip.
- try a stable and development version without rebooting,
- have probing with user interaction ("if you see me please
press enter else I will try the previous driver in 15 seconds.")
instead of deciding on "failsafe" (vga/vesa) and "fast"
(special driver) at boot.
I love it!
Just the take_over_console() as alternative API looks strange.
It's ok as an intermeditate step (likely, if I remember the discussions
correctly). If it should stay, it should require the console to
be registered first.
Can be changed later, once as you make progress and don't reach a release
kernel. This is NO show stopper for me.
Progress is the most important thing for development in this areas
until it reaches a release kernel.
Regards
Ingo Oeser
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-06-10 11:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-06-09 8:40 [PATCH 3/5] VT binding: Update fbcon to support binding Antonino A. Daplas
2006-06-10 11:10 ` Ingo Oeser [this message]
2006-06-10 13:28 ` Antonino A. Daplas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200606101310.04174.ioe-lkml@rameria.de \
--to=ioe-lkml@rameria.de \
--cc=adaplas@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-fbdev-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).