From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Subject: Re: Display class Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 23:54:18 -0800 Message-ID: <20070114075418.GD10585@kroah.com> References: <200612292232.44122.dtor@insightbb.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: Cc: Dmitry Torokhov , Miguel Ojeda , Linux Kernel Mailing List , oLinux Fbdev development list , Luming Yu , Andrew Zabolotny , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, kernel-discuss@handhelds.org, lcd4linux-devel@sf.net On Sat, Jan 13, 2007 at 10:40:55PM +0000, James Simmons wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > On Tuesday 05 December 2006 13:03, James Simmons wrote: > > > +int probe_edid(struct display_device *dev, void *data) > > > +{ > > > +???????struct fb_monspecs spec; > > > +???????ssize_t size = 45; > > That code was only for testing. I do have new core code. Andrew could > you merge this patch as it is against the -mm tree. > > This new class provides a way common interface for various types of > displays such as LCD, CRT, LVDS etc. It is a expansion of the lcd > class to include other types of displays. Any chance you can change this to use "struct device" instead of "struct class_device" so I don't have to convert it myself in the next few weeks if it ever gets merged? :) The functionality will be the same, if not, please let me know what problems you have with the change. thanks, greg k-h