From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tilman Sauerbeck Subject: Re: Matrox G550, dual head, 1680x1050 Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 07:59:12 +0100 Message-ID: <20070305065911.GA1017@code-monkey.de> References: <200703021053.00955.hjk@linutronix.de> <200703021610.58188.hjk@linutronix.de> <20070302152414.GC907@code-monkey.de> <200703042247.21590.hjk@linutronix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0591808832==" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <200703042247.21590.hjk@linutronix.de> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Mime-version: 1.0 Sender: xorg-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Errors-To: xorg-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Hans-J=FCrgen?= Koch Cc: linux-fbdev-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, xorg@lists.freedesktop.org --===============0591808832== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="0OAP2g/MAC+5xKAE" Content-Disposition: inline --0OAP2g/MAC+5xKAE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hans-J=FCrgen Koch [2007-03-04 22:47]: > @matroxfb developers: Thanks a lot, guys! Well done! Most people I asked = about=20 > having a dual-head framebuffer console at 1680x1050 thought it would be= =20 > impossible. >=20 > @mga xorg developers: Well... Can you tell me why the kernel guys can=20 > initialize and use the second head and you can't? If you can give me hint= s=20 > where in the source I can start to look for the bug, I'm willing to spend= =20 > some time there. Is there something I could try in my configuration? matroxfb is much better organized wrt dual-head configurations. It also has support for some hardware that xf86-video-mga doesn't support yet. I'm working on that. I think you might be hitting this bug: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D9854 I just attached a temporary fix that you could try. Regards, Tilman --=20 A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail? --0OAP2g/MAC+5xKAE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFF67+/27uLisrW2w8RAp1WAKCHK5kgiEYMeWoP7j2ZiCNmRMSjwgCfYqTw qJ9UAIaJy9xhFOjif5pPkk0= =aK8D -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --0OAP2g/MAC+5xKAE-- --===============0591808832== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ xorg mailing list xorg@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg --===============0591808832==--