From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: "Daniel Würfel" <daniel.wuerfel@gmx.net>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fbdev-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 9155] New: No fan control with ATI Radeon display support on HP nx6125.
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 22:32:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200710152232.35324.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1192468342.6249.9.camel@localhost>
On Monday, 15 October 2007 19:12, Daniel Würfel wrote:
> Am Sonntag, den 14.10.2007, 21:55 +0200 schrieb Rafael J. Wysocki:
> > On Sunday, 14 October 2007 16:18, Daniel Würfel wrote:
> > > Am Sonntag, den 14.10.2007, 16:02 +0200 schrieb Rafael J. Wysocki:
> > > > On Sunday, 14 October 2007 09:26, Daniel Würfel wrote:
> > > > > Hi there,
> > > > >
> > > > > at first great respect for your fast answers.
> > > > > I don't think, that the binary ati driver is the problem, because:
> > > > > 1. with switched of "ati radeon display support" in the kernel, the fan
> > > > > control works correctly (and i still using the ati-driver)
> > > >
> > > > How do you know, however, that the "ati radeon display support" in the kernel
> > > > does not interfere with the ATI driver in a destructive way?
> > >
> > > I think, but im not sure, that the ati driver is loaded, if X was
> > > started. But at this moment X was not started.
> >
> > Well, the kernel module part is probably loaded earlier.
> >
> > > > > 2. the fan starts spinning at the boot screen even if the radeon display
> > > > > driver was loaded (and the ati driver is not just loaded yet).
> > > >
> > > > I'm not sure what you mean exactly. Can you clarify, please?dann
> > >
> > > Well, i see it looks a little bit confused what i wrote. What i mean is,
> > > that the fan at this time starts to rotate, when the "radeon display
> > > support" is loaded at boot time.
> >
> > I see.
> >
> > Can you please check:
> > - What happens if you don't use the ATI driver at all (please unload its kernel
> > module before loading the kernel's radeon one)?
> > - Does the loading of the radeon module trigger the fan automatically?
> > - What happens if the fan module is not loaded at that time?
>
> I think i got the problem:
> I made some test. The problem is the module radeonfb. If i compile
> radeonfb as a module there is no problem with the fan control. But if i
> compile it into the kernel, than fan control will be destroyed and the
> fan doesn't stop working from the beginning of the system start.
> The other modules (fglrx, agp_gart) have no influence to the fan
> behaviour.
Thanks for having narrowed this, good job.
Now, the question is why the radeonfb compiled in statically has this effect.
Can you please attach your current .config to the bugzilla entry?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-15 20:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <bug-9155-10286@http.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
2007-10-13 17:53 ` [Bugme-new] [Bug 9155] New: No fan control with ATI Radeon display support on HP nx6125 Andrew Morton
[not found] ` <20071013105315.accef6aa.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2007-10-13 18:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-10-14 7:26 ` Daniel Würfel
2007-10-14 14:02 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-10-14 14:18 ` Daniel Würfel
2007-10-14 19:55 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-10-15 17:12 ` Daniel Würfel
2007-10-15 20:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2007-10-15 20:57 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-15 21:17 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200710152232.35324.rjw@sisk.pl \
--to=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel.wuerfel@gmx.net \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fbdev-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).