From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andres Salomon Subject: Re: + pm-gxfb-add-hook-to-pm-console-layer-that-allows-disabling-of-suspen d-vt-switch.patch added to -mm tree Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 10:57:50 -0400 Message-ID: <20080313105750.3e50107a@ephemeral> References: <200803120527.m2C5RmWl011967@imap1.linux-foundation.org> <20080312085149.GA3993@ucw.cz> <20080312144506.GE1018@cosmic.amd.com> <20080313074332.GA19117@elf.ucw.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20080313074332.GA19117@elf.ucw.cz> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Pavel Machek Cc: Jordan Crouse , akpm@linux-foundation.org, kernel list , Linux-pm mailing list , linux-fbdev-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, adaplas@pol.net, mm-commits@vger.kernel.org, rjw@sisk.pl On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 08:43:32 +0100 Pavel Machek wrote: [...] > > > > > Also, it would be nice to make the logic the other way around. Move vt > > > switching to the drivers that need it because X can be expected to own > > > the hardware. > > > > Conservation of energy. Its easier to make 3 or 4 drivers opt out of > > Nice euphemism. You did quick hack instead of proper solution, and > someone will have to clean it up sooner or later... > Pavel > And I wouldn't be willing to do anything further without approval from the fbdevel folks. No one's stopping you from writing a patch if you feel so strongly about it, though.