From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: JosephChan@via.com.tw
Cc: geert@linux-m68k.org, linux-fbdev-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/13 v2] viafb: accel.c, accel.h
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 09:36:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080821093654.4947f140.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <C80EF34A3D2E494DBAF9AC29C7AE4EB8285FDD@exchtp03.taipei.via.com.tw>
On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 22:30:57 +0800 <JosephChan@via.com.tw> wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> It's our carelessness to check with x86_64 version. And thanks for reminding this.
> The
>
>
> >due to things like this:
> >
> > MMIO_OUT32(VIA_REG_DSTBASE,
> > ((u32) (info->screen_base) - (u32) viafb_FB_MM) >> 3);
> >
> >now, we could just shut the warnings up by casting to (long) instead.
>
> >But I wonder what's going on in there. ->screen_base came from
> >ioremap_nocache() and AFAIK there's no guarantee that this virtual
> >address will be less than 4G on 64-bit machines?
>
>
> >If the !VIA_MMIO code has no valid use then please just remove it.
> >
> >The VIA_MMIO!=0 macros inplicitly reference a local variable which is
> >the kind of dopey programming trick which should not be performed in
> >new code. It would be much better to do
> >
> >static inline void via_writel(struct viafb_par *viaparinfo, int reg, u32 val)
> >{
> > writel(val, viaparinfo->io_virt + reg);
> >}
> >
> >and use that everywhere.
> >
> >It would also be quite acceptable to simply open-code the
> >
> > writel(val, viaparinfo->io_virt + reg);
> >
> >at all callsites.
> >
> >Those macros may have made it easier to _write_ the code, but they make
> >it harder to _read_ it. That's a wrong tradeoff.
>
> Yes, the code seems to be cleaner after removing the macro.
> We define this macro for convenient debugging originally
> (MMIO couldn't work due to some wired reason, we can
> transfer to PORT easily by changing VIA_MMIO=0).
> It is a real tradeoff.
ok.
> If necessary, we could modify this patch by following your
> suggestions.
> Should we do that? or they're already done by you?
An incremental patch against the previous patches would be best, please.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-21 16:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-08 10:11 [PATCH 3/13 v2] viafb: accel.c, accel.h JosephChan
2008-08-19 23:23 ` Andrew Morton
2008-08-21 14:30 ` JosephChan
2008-08-21 16:36 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080821093654.4947f140.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=JosephChan@via.com.tw \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=linux-fbdev-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).