From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [GIT PULL]: OMAP2/3 Display Subsystem Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 13:03:04 -0700 Message-ID: <20090922130304.ffe24448.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <1253622588.25232.11.camel@tubuntu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1253622588.25232.11.camel@tubuntu> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: tomi.valkeinen@nokia.com Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tony@atomide.com, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-fbdev-devel@lists.sourceforge.net On Tue, 22 Sep 2009 15:29:48 +0300 Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > Linus, > > Here's the new display subsystem and framebuffer driver for OMAP2/3. > > The driver has been reviewed on linux-omap and linux-fbdev-devel, and is in > use, for example, on N900, Beagle Board and Overo boards. We have an ACK for > the OMAP parts from Tony Lindgren, who maintains the OMAP platform. > > We have gotten positive feedback about the driver, for example in this thread: > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125171081901820&w=2 > > The driver is actively maintained and developed further, and I have already a > bunch of patches on top of these patches, but I would like to get the big core > driver merged first. After the driver is merged, other people can send patches > to LCD drivers and board files to enable the new display subsystem on their > boards. > > Andrew said 2-3 weeks ago that he'll merge the driver (after he has looked > through it), but he hasn't responded since then. I'm guessing he's quite busy. That's because it came very late and conflicts considerably with changes which are already pending. > Please pull the new OMAP2/3 display subsystem driver from: > > git://gitorious.org/linux-omap-dss2/linux.git for-linus > Confused. These conflicts heavily with the changes which I've already queued, does it not? Ones which were queued way earlier than this material. If so, why on earth did you send a pull request, knowing that it would trash my tree?