From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] SECURITY ISSUE with connector Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2009 09:57:24 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20091002.095724.12562070.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1254487211-11810-1-git-send-email-philipp.reisner@linbit.com> <20091002135859.GA9383@kroah.com> <200910021754.12940.philipp.reisner@linbit.com> Reply-To: device-mapper development Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <200910021754.12940.philipp.reisner@linbit.com> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" To: philipp.reisner@linbit.com Cc: linux-fbdev-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, greg@kroah.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, zbr@ioremap.net, akpm@linux-foundation.org From: Philipp Reisner Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 17:54:12 +0200 > Think of the connector as a layer on top of netlink that allows more > than a hard coded number of subsystems to use netlink. There are no such limits in netlink, we have 'genetlink' which allows an arbitrary number of subsystems to use netlink. What connector provides over netlink/genetlink is something different altogether.