From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 06:59:21 +0000
Subject: Re: [PATCH] video: arcfb: fix buffer overflow
Message-Id: <20101124065921.GH11705@linux-sh.org>
List-Id: <linux-fbdev.vger.kernel.org>
References: <1290361202-15065-1-git-send-email-segoon@openwall.com> <20101124062558.GF11705@linux-sh.org> <20101124064649.GQ1522@bicker>
In-Reply-To: <20101124064649.GQ1522@bicker>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>, Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@openwall.com>, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Jaya Kumar <jayalk@intworks.biz>, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 09:46:49AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 03:25:58PM +0900, Paul Mundt wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 08:40:01PM +0300, Vasiliy Kulikov wrote:
> > > (count + p) is not checked for integer overflow.  If p < fbmemlength
> > > and count = (size_t)(1 - p) (very big unsigned integer) then
> > > count + p = 1 < fbmemlength and copy_to_user(base_addr+p, buf, count)
> > > overflows base_addr.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@openwall.com>
> > 
> > Applied, thanks.
> 
> The patch is harmless, but the integer overflow would actually be caught
> in rw_verify_area().
> 
Ah, so it is, I'll drop it then, thanks.