linux-fbdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
To: Guan Xuetao <guanxuetao@mprc.pku.edu.cn>
Cc: sfr@canb.auug.org.au, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	gregkh@suse.de, jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org,
	dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com, dtor@mail.ru, rubini@cvml.unipv.it,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Request for unicore32 architecture codes to merge into linux-next
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 04:33:24 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110118043323.GF2122@linux-sh.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <004901cbb4d5$b9bb1370$2d313a50$@mprc.pku.edu.cn>

On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 01:00:31AM +0800, Guan Xuetao wrote:
>  drivers/staging/puv3/Kconfig                  |  125 ++
>  drivers/staging/puv3/Makefile                 |   22 +
>  drivers/staging/puv3/TODO                     |    7 +
>  drivers/staging/puv3/i8042-ucio.h             |   89 ++
>  drivers/staging/puv3/puv3-atkbd.h             |   43 +
>  drivers/staging/puv3/puv3_ac97.c              |  369 +++++
>  drivers/staging/puv3/puv3_i2c.c               |  309 ++++
>  drivers/staging/puv3/puv3_pcm.c               |  435 ++++++
>  drivers/staging/puv3/puv3_pcm.h               |   28 +
>  drivers/staging/puv3/puv3_umal.c              | 2069 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/staging/puv3/puv3_unifb.c             |  965 ++++++++++++

Staging is not a shortcut around having things reviewed or broken out
logically. It's of course fine to merge the bulk of things in one go for
when a new architecture is going on, but logically disparate parts still
need to be broken out and sent to the proper places for review. It's
obvious you haven't done this for any of the non-arch bits and hiding
things under staging is not going to make this step any less necessary.

If you want your framebuffer driver reviewed, then split it out and
submit it to the linux-fbdev list for review. Once that's had a going
over and been Acked then of course it can be merged through whatever tree
you like, and there's even a good chance that you don't need to bother
with staging at all.

Using staging as a review circumvention measure however is just not going
to fly.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-01-18  4:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-01-15 17:00 Request for unicore32 architecture codes to merge into linux-next Guan Xuetao
2011-01-15 22:08 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-16 15:35   ` Guan Xuetao
2011-01-18  4:33 ` Paul Mundt [this message]
2011-01-18  9:07   ` Guan Xuetao
2011-01-18  9:10     ` Paul Mundt
2011-01-18  9:33       ` Guan Xuetao
2011-01-18  9:53         ` Paul Mundt
2011-01-18 18:33 ` Request for unicore32 architecture codes to merge into Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-01-19  2:20   ` Request for unicore32 architecture codes to merge into linux-next Guan Xuetao
2011-01-20 19:42 ` Request for unicore32 architecture codes to merge into Jesse Barnes
2011-01-22  2:17   ` Request for unicore32 architecture codes to merge into linux-next Guan Xuetao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110118043323.GF2122@linux-sh.org \
    --to=lethal@linux-sh.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
    --cc=dtor@mail.ru \
    --cc=gregkh@suse.de \
    --cc=guanxuetao@mprc.pku.edu.cn \
    --cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rubini@cvml.unipv.it \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).