From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jesse Barnes Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 21:22:27 +0000 Subject: Re: Future desktop on dumb frame buffers? Message-Id: <20110321142227.6c968711@jbarnes-desktop> List-Id: References: <20110321110040.6f1ea6d3@jbarnes-desktop> <20110321122518.6b7ec7e4@jbarnes-desktop> <20110321212008.384711f0@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20110321212008.384711f0-qBU/x9rampVanCEyBjwyrvXRex20P6io@public.gmane.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Alan Cox Cc: timofonic timofonic , Geert Uytterhoeven , Linux Fbdev development list , dri-devel-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org, wayland-devel-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 21:20:08 +0000 Alan Cox wrote: > > 1) inertia: fbdev has been around a lot longer, and provides most of > > what embedded devices need anyway > > 2) feature set: why bother doing a full KMS driver if you're not > > going to use any of the additional features it would provide (output > > management, memory management, execution management) > > 3) its got documentation Jeez, some people want it all. You looking for docs for the ioctls and such? -- Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center