From: "Bruno Prémont" <bonbons@linux-vserver.org>
To: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: "Antonino A. Daplas" <adaplas@gmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] fbmem: reset file->private_data on failed fb_open()
Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2011 06:10:19 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110609081019.145ed6d5@pluto.restena.lu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110609030628.GA10233@localhost>
On Thu, 9 Jun 2011 11:06:28 Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com> wrote:
> I wrote this when looking at NULL dereference bug
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id\x18912
The trace over there rather looks like closing of a framebuffer that
has been replaced (and destroyed) during boot sequence.
This action happens when switching from VESA to KMS from initrd
or early userspace boot sequence where plymouthd had already opened
vesafb.
That should hopefully be fixed by refcounting FBs as done during
2.6.39-rc7.
> Will it help by clearing private_data? I have no idea at all, because
> for regular files, ->release won't be called on failed ->open. Just in
> case there are some exceptions in fbmem...
fb devices files should be just as regular as any other device files...
> ---
> drivers/video/fbmem.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> --- linux-next.orig/drivers/video/fbmem.c 2011-06-09 10:36:06.000000000 +0800
> +++ linux-next/drivers/video/fbmem.c 2011-06-09 10:39:30.000000000 +0800
> @@ -1424,26 +1424,28 @@ __releases(&info->lock)
> file->private_data = info;
> if (info->fbops->fb_open) {
> res = info->fbops->fb_open(info,1);
> if (res)
> module_put(info->fbops->owner);
> }
> #ifdef CONFIG_FB_DEFERRED_IO
> if (info->fbdefio)
> fb_deferred_io_open(info, inode, file);
> #endif
> out:
> mutex_unlock(&info->lock);
> - if (res)
> + if (res) {
> + file->private_data = NULL;
> put_fb_info(info);
> + }
> return res;
> }
>
> static int
> fb_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
> __acquires(&info->lock)
> __releases(&info->lock)
> {
> struct fb_info * const info = file->private_data;
>
> mutex_lock(&info->lock);
> if (info->fbops->fb_release)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-09 6:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-09 3:06 [RFC] fbmem: reset file->private_data on failed fb_open() Wu Fengguang
2011-06-09 6:10 ` Bruno Prémont [this message]
2011-06-09 6:38 ` Wu Fengguang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110609081019.145ed6d5@pluto.restena.lu \
--to=bonbons@linux-vserver.org \
--cc=adaplas@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).