From: "Bruno Prémont" <bonbons@linux-vserver.org>
To: Florian Tobias Schandinat <FlorianSchandinat@gmx.de>
Cc: lethal@linux-sh.org, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org,
francis.moro@gmail.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski <herton@mandriva.com.br>,
stable@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fb: avoid possible deadlock caused by fb_set_suspend
Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 08:43:11 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110618104311.6d80ba50@neptune.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1308337359-3480-1-git-send-email-FlorianSchandinat@gmx.de>
On Fri, 17 June 2011 Florian Tobias Schandinat <FlorianSchandinat@gmx.de> wrote:
> From: Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski <herton@mandriva.com.br>
>
> A lock ordering issue can cause deadlocks: in framebuffer/console code,
> all needed struct fb_info locks are taken before acquire_console_sem(),
> in places which need to take console semaphore.
>
> But fb_set_suspend is always called with console semaphore held, and
> inside it we call lock_fb_info which gets the fb_info lock, inverse
> locking order of what the rest of the code does. This causes a real
> deadlock issue, when we write to state fb sysfs attribute (which calls
> fb_set_suspend) while a framebuffer is being unregistered by
> remove_conflicting_framebuffers, as can be shown by following show
> blocked state trace on a test program which loads i915 and runs another
> forked processes writing to state attribute:
>
> Test process with semaphore held and trying to get fb_info lock:
...
> fb-test2 which reproduces above is available on kernel.org bug #26232.
> To solve this issue, avoid calling lock_fb_info inside fb_set_suspend,
> and move it out to where needed (callers of fb_set_suspend must call
> lock_fb_info before if needed). So far, the only place which needs to
> call lock_fb_info is store_fbstate, all other places which calls
> fb_set_suspend are suspend/resume hooks that should not need the lock as
> they should be run only when processes are already frozen in
> suspend/resume.
From a quick look through FB drivers in 2.6.39 I've found one that would need
more work:
- drivers/video/sh_mobile_hdmi.c: sh_hdmi_edid_work_fn()
Should get changed to
a) right locking order in case (hdmi->hp_state = HDMI_HOTPLUG_CONNECTED)
b) lock fb_info in the other case
For this one fb_set_suspend() does get call in a hotplug worker,
thus independently on suspend/resume process.
The rest does match the suspend/resume hook pattern mentioned.
Bruno
> References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id&232
> Signed-off-by: Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski <herton@mandriva.com.br>
> Signed-off-by: Florian Tobias Schandinat <FlorianSchandinat@gmx.de>
> Cc: stable@kernel.org
> ---
> drivers/video/fbmem.c | 3 ---
> drivers/video/fbsysfs.c | 3 +++
> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/video/fbmem.c b/drivers/video/fbmem.c
> index 5aac00e..ad93629 100644
> --- a/drivers/video/fbmem.c
> +++ b/drivers/video/fbmem.c
> @@ -1738,8 +1738,6 @@ void fb_set_suspend(struct fb_info *info, int state)
> {
> struct fb_event event;
>
> - if (!lock_fb_info(info))
> - return;
> event.info = info;
> if (state) {
> fb_notifier_call_chain(FB_EVENT_SUSPEND, &event);
> @@ -1748,7 +1746,6 @@ void fb_set_suspend(struct fb_info *info, int state)
> info->state = FBINFO_STATE_RUNNING;
> fb_notifier_call_chain(FB_EVENT_RESUME, &event);
> }
> - unlock_fb_info(info);
> }
>
> /**
> diff --git a/drivers/video/fbsysfs.c b/drivers/video/fbsysfs.c
> index 04251ce..67afa9c 100644
> --- a/drivers/video/fbsysfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/video/fbsysfs.c
> @@ -399,9 +399,12 @@ static ssize_t store_fbstate(struct device *device,
>
> state = simple_strtoul(buf, &last, 0);
>
> + if (!lock_fb_info(fb_info))
> + return -ENODEV;
> console_lock();
> fb_set_suspend(fb_info, (int)state);
> console_unlock();
> + unlock_fb_info(fb_info);
>
> return count;
> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-18 8:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <BANLkTiko+2AM8dq8jP5xjbTcCM63hBAK=A@mail.gmail.com>
2011-06-14 18:15 ` Possible deadlock when suspending framebuffer Linus Torvalds
2011-06-14 19:04 ` Florian Tobias Schandinat
2011-06-17 18:46 ` [PATCH] fb: avoid possible deadlock caused by fb_set_suspend Florian Tobias Schandinat
2011-06-18 8:43 ` Bruno Prémont [this message]
2011-06-18 9:19 ` Bruno Prémont
2011-09-01 15:42 ` Florian Tobias Schandinat
2011-09-01 16:28 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2011-09-02 16:06 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2011-09-02 16:46 ` Florian Tobias Schandinat
2011-09-02 17:24 ` [PATCH] fb: sh-mobile: Fix deadlock risk between lock_fb_info() and Bruno Prémont
2011-09-02 20:54 ` [PATCH] fb: sh-mobile: Fix deadlock risk between lock_fb_info() Florian Tobias Schandinat
2011-07-20 18:16 ` [PATCH] fb: avoid possible deadlock caused by fb_set_suspend Florian Tobias Schandinat
2011-07-28 22:10 ` Francis Moreau
2011-06-15 1:09 ` re:Possible deadlock when suspending framebuffer Wanlong Gao
2011-06-15 5:58 ` Possible " Bruno Prémont
2011-06-15 6:22 ` Wanlong Gao
2011-06-15 7:04 ` Américo Wang
2011-06-15 7:12 ` Francis Moreau
2011-06-15 10:20 ` Bruno Prémont
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110618104311.6d80ba50@neptune.home \
--to=bonbons@linux-vserver.org \
--cc=FlorianSchandinat@gmx.de \
--cc=francis.moro@gmail.com \
--cc=herton@mandriva.com.br \
--cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
--cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).