From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Laurent Pinchart Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 22:44:10 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH] fbdev: sh_mobile_lcdc: Turn dot clock on before resuming from runtime PM Message-Id: <201109210044.12706.laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> List-Id: References: <1310387754-23033-1-git-send-email-laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> In-Reply-To: <1310387754-23033-1-git-send-email-laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org Hi Florian, On Tuesday 20 September 2011 22:19:25 Florian Tobias Schandinat wrote: > On 09/20/2011 07:56 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > On Tuesday 20 September 2011 21:52:36 Florian Tobias Schandinat wrote: > >> On 09/20/2011 07:30 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > >>> On Monday 11 July 2011 14:35:54 Laurent Pinchart wrote: > >>>> Resuming from runtime PM restores all LCDC registers. If the dot clock > >>>> is off at that time display panning information will be corrupted. > >>>> > >>>> Turn the dot clock on before resuming from runtime PM. Similarly, > >>>> turn the clock off after suspending the LCDC. > >>> > >>> Could you please pick this patch for v3.2 ? > >> > >> I assume you meant the currently developed 3.1? (as 3.2 is the next one > >> for which the patch is lying in my fbdev-next anyway) > > > > No, I meant v3.2. As I haven't received any pull notification in response > > to the patch, and as I had no way to check your fbdev-next tree on > > kernel.org, I just wanted to make sure the patch would be queued for > > v3.2. > > Just for your info, my tree [1] never was on kernel.org, you can see the > patch in it here [2] (webfrontend). Looks like the patch I got come from > your pull request "SH mobile LCDC cleanups and fixes", hope that's the > right version. Oops, my bad. I'm rebasing my pending patches on top of your fbdev/fbdev-next tree. There are a couple of conflicts, I'll resent the rebased patches to the list. -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart