From: Wang YanQing <udknight@gmail.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: FlorianSchandinat@gmx.de, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, spock@gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] video:uvesafb: Fix oops that uvesafb try to execute NX-protected page
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 00:52:38 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120328005238.GA3844@udknight> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120327143243.015ecff6@pyramind.ukuu.org.uk>
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 02:32:43PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Mar 2012 18:01:36 +0800
> Wang YanQing <udknight@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > Ok! I try to check pcibios_enabled first, but get some opposition by Alan Cox,
> > but I want to make thing work and fix the oops, so I choice the simple way to
> > check the (__supported_pte_mask & _PAGE_NX) instead of to check this variable plus
> > pci kernel boot parameter, pci mmconfig works or not, and more, and more. It is not
> > the best method, but it works and maybe all will feel happy.
>
> Okay let me ask the obvious question - why is it not the best method ?
>
> Apart from adding a helper in the includes for the arch code of
>
> static inline is_nx_enabled(void)
> {
> return !!(__supported_pte_mask & _PAGE_NX);
> }
>
> is there anything else it lacks ?
>
> Yes ideally we'd set the relevant ROM areas executable, but for a simple
> fix is there anything else that's a problem with it ?
Ok! Maybe you had missed my previous reply
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1272433
It is not the best method, because the check is not enough.
I means when NX is actively, the pci bios is NX or not also depend on
the code path in pci_arch_init which will be influenced by the acpi on or off, pci kernel boot
parameter, even kernel config like pci access method PCI_GOANY, PCI_GOMMCONFIG, or PCI_GODIRECT,
but if I check the pcibios_enabled, all the above can be ignored.
if uvesafb use the PMI when PCI BIOS is X, it can get the better work efficience then use the redraw
method as a fallback when do the panning.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-28 0:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-02 0:48 [PATCH] video:uvesafb: Fix oops that uvesafb try to execute NX-protected page Wang YanQing
2012-03-05 0:52 ` Wang YanQing
2012-03-05 7:09 ` Florian Tobias Schandinat
2012-03-05 7:25 ` Wang YanQing
2012-03-09 0:39 ` Michal Januszewski
2012-03-21 18:34 ` Florian Tobias Schandinat
2012-03-27 10:01 ` Wang YanQing
2012-03-27 13:32 ` Alan Cox
2012-03-28 0:52 ` Wang YanQing [this message]
2012-04-01 1:05 ` Wang YanQing
2012-04-10 6:49 ` Wang YanQing
2012-04-10 14:28 ` Alan Cox
2012-03-28 15:36 ` Hein_Tibosch
2012-03-31 21:31 ` Florian Tobias Schandinat
2012-04-01 0:47 ` Wang YanQing
2012-04-01 0:55 ` Wang YanQing
2012-04-01 0:54 ` Wang YanQing
2012-04-12 2:22 ` Florian Tobias Schandinat
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120328005238.GA3844@udknight \
--to=udknight@gmail.com \
--cc=FlorianSchandinat@gmx.de \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=spock@gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).