From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Anton Vorontsov Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2012 00:51:17 +0000 Subject: Re: Gethering power management/policy hw drivers under drivers/power/? (Re: [RFC][PATCH v3 1/3] runt Message-Id: <20120801005117.GA1798@lizard> List-Id: References: <1343390750-3642-1-git-send-email-acourbot@nvidia.com> <5015E8AE.8060404@nvidia.com> <20120730024049.GA10442@lizard> <201207302259.39396.rjw@sisk.pl> In-Reply-To: <201207302259.39396.rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Alex Courbot , Jean Pihet , Greg Kroah-Hartman , David Woodhouse , Stephen Warren , Thierry Reding , Simon Glass , Grant Likely , Rob Herring , Mark Brown , Arnd Bergmann , "linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , "linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , "linux-fbdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , "devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org" , Liam Girdwood , MyungJoo Ham , linux-pm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 10:59:39PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: [...] > > Well, currently drivers/power/ is indeed just for power supply class > > subsystem and drivers. But if the trend is to gather power management > > ("policy") stuff under one directory, i.e. > > > > drivers/ > > power/ > > supplies/ <- former "power supply class and drivers" > > regulators/ > > idle/ > > cpuidle/ > > cpufreq/ > > devfreq/ > > avs/ > > ... > > > > That would probably make sense, we could easily see the big picture. > > But if we're not going to do this long-term, > > Yes, we may do this eventually, but surely not right now. OK, great! Then I'll probably start thinking about moving power supply drivers into its own directory, maybe in 3.7. Thanks! -- Anton Vorontsov Email: cbouatmailru@gmail.com