From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 18:47:03 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] Runtime Interpreted Power Sequences Message-Id: <20120816184703.GP15365@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> List-Id: References: <1345097337-24170-1-git-send-email-acourbot@nvidia.com> <1345097337-24170-2-git-send-email-acourbot@nvidia.com> <502D3E29.1010501@wwwdotorg.org> In-Reply-To: <502D3E29.1010501-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Stephen Warren Cc: Alexandre Courbot , Stephen Warren , Thierry Reding , Simon Glass , Grant Likely , Rob Herring , Anton Vorontsov , David Woodhouse , Arnd Bergmann , Leela Krishna Amudala , linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-fbdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org, linux-doc-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 12:38:33PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: > Note that this somewhat conflicts with accessing the top-level power > sequence by name too; perhaps that should be re-thought too. I must > admit this DT rule kinda sucks. Given that currently the information there is useless and ignored is there any reason we can't just change the rule? It'd be rather more constructive...