From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Morton Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 03:54:16 +0000 Subject: Re: 3.8-rc2 lockdep complains about console_lock vs. fb_notifier_list.rwsem Message-Id: <20130116195416.c2d9a107.akpm@linux-foundation.org> List-Id: References: <20130117024246.GF20928@kroah.com> In-Reply-To: <20130117024246.GF20928@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Takashi Iwai , sedat.dilek@gmail.com, Jiri Kosina , linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, LKML , alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Jiri Slaby On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 18:42:46 -0800 Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > FWIW, Andrew took my patch in mm: > > http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/fb-rework-locking-to-fix-lock-ordering-on-takeover.patch > > http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/fb-yet-another-band-aid-for-fixing-lockdep-mess.patch > > > Ok, so, which one should I take for 3.8? And ideally the fb maintainer > should do this, not I, right? Please see http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-fbdev/msg08954.html Tomi might be able to review the above for us. I think we need both. If nothing else happens I intend to send both Linuswards for 3.8 in a week or two.