From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, airlied@redhat.com, axboe@kernel.dk,
tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com,
rostedt@goodmis.org, linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, robin.randhawa@arm.com,
Steve.Bannister@arm.com, Liviu.Dudau@arm.com,
charles.garcia-tobin@arm.com, arvind.chauhan@arm.com,
linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, patches@linaro.org,
linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 5/5] fbcon: queue work on power efficient wq
Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 17:57:59 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130514175759.GK6795@mtj.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <89924f001e3ddd66ab41a16500569a976ea846fd.1366803121.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 05:12:57PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> fbcon uses workqueues and it has no real dependency of scheduling these on the
> cpu which scheduled them.
>
> On a idle system, it is observed that and idle cpu wakes up many times just to
> service this work. It would be better if we can schedule it on a cpu which the
> scheduler believes to be the most appropriate one.
>
> This patch replaces system_wq with system_power_efficient_wq.
>
> Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
> Cc: linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Dave, applied this to wq/for-3.11. Please holler if you want this to
be routed differently.
Thanks!
--
tejun
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-14 17:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <cover.1366803121.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
2013-04-24 11:54 ` [PATCH V5 5/5] fbcon: queue work on power efficient wq Viresh Kumar
2013-05-14 17:57 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130514175759.GK6795@mtj.dyndns.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=Liviu.Dudau@arm.com \
--cc=Steve.Bannister@arm.com \
--cc=airlied@redhat.com \
--cc=arvind.chauhan@arm.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=charles.garcia-tobin@arm.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=patches@linaro.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=robin.randhawa@arm.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).