fb_monspecs and device tree

fb_monspecs and device tree

[Richard Genoud]

Hi !

I've been using the display-timings device tree node (great job !) on
a sam9x5 soc.

I was wondering if there's a planned support for struct fb_monspecs in
device tree, (or if it is irrelevant), if someone is already working
on that etc...


Regards,
Richard.

Re: fb_monspecs and device tree

[Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD]

On 11:41 Tue 28 May     , Richard Genoud wrote:
> Hi !
> 
> I've been using the display-timings device tree node (great job !) on
> a sam9x5 soc.
> 
> I was wondering if there's a planned support for struct fb_monspecs in
> device tree, (or if it is irrelevant), if someone is already working
> on that etc...

 I'm working on this but not on fbdev on DRI/KMS
 so we can have a full support of the overlay & co
 but I'm going to change complely the dt binding with the one present on
 github

 beawre the lcdc is already done on fbdev with display-timings

 but I'll be off the first week on June so wait a few for sam9x5

 Best Regards,
 J.
> 
> 
> Regards,
> Richard.
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fbdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: fb_monspecs and device tree

[Richard Genoud]

2013/5/28 Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>:
> On 11:41 Tue 28 May     , Richard Genoud wrote:
>> Hi !
>>
>> I've been using the display-timings device tree node (great job !) on
>> a sam9x5 soc.
>>
>> I was wondering if there's a planned support for struct fb_monspecs in
>> device tree, (or if it is irrelevant), if someone is already working
>> on that etc...
>
>  I'm working on this but not on fbdev on DRI/KMS
>  so we can have a full support of the overlay & co
>  but I'm going to change complely the dt binding with the one present on
>  github
>
>  beawre the lcdc is already done on fbdev with display-timings
>
>  but I'll be off the first week on June so wait a few for sam9x5
>
>  Best Regards,
>  J.

ok, that's good news !

thanks.