From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 19:20:59 +0000
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 0/8] PHY framework
Message-Id: <20130827192059.GZ3005@radagast>
MIME-Version: 1
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="kqOsKy60S4p104jH"
List-Id: <linux-fbdev.vger.kernel.org>
References: <1377063973-22044-1-git-send-email-kishon@ti.com>
 <521B0E79.6060506@ti.com>
In-Reply-To: <521B0E79.6060506@ti.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org

--kqOsKy60S4p104jH
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi,

On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 01:44:49PM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
> On Wednesday 21 August 2013 11:16 AM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
> > Added a generic PHY framework that provides a set of APIs for the PHY d=
rivers
> > to create/destroy a PHY and APIs for the PHY users to obtain a referenc=
e to
> > the PHY with or without using phandle.
> >=20
> > This framework will be of use only to devices that uses external PHY (P=
HY
> > functionality is not embedded within the controller).
> >=20
> > The intention of creating this framework is to bring the phy drivers sp=
read
> > all over the Linux kernel to drivers/phy to increase code re-use and to
> > increase code maintainability.
> >=20
> > Comments to make PHY as bus wasn't done because PHY devices can be part=
 of
> > other bus and making a same device attached to multiple bus leads to bad
> > design.
> >=20
> > If the PHY driver has to send notification on connect/disconnect, the P=
HY
> > driver should make use of the extcon framework. Using this susbsystem
> > to use extcon framwork will have to be analysed.
> >=20
> > You can find this patch series @
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kishon/linux-phy.git test=
ing
>=20
> Looks like there are not further comments on this series. Can you take th=
is in
> your misc tree?

Do you want me to queue these for you ? There are quite a few users for
this framework already and I know of at least 2 others which will show
up for v3.13.

Let me know.

cheers

--=20
balbi

--kqOsKy60S4p104jH
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
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=n6Sq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--kqOsKy60S4p104jH--