From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Morton Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2013 00:43:15 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: remove Richard Purdie as backlight maintainer Message-Id: <20131003174315.d9aa8af7.akpm@linux-foundation.org> List-Id: References: <017f01cebb35$f6a82ac0$e3f88040$%han@samsung.com> <20131003162048.d4be6510f36da5c61dc61c43@linux-foundation.org> <003801cec093$6b3c1bf0$41b453d0$%han@samsung.com> In-Reply-To: <003801cec093$6b3c1bf0$41b453d0$%han@samsung.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Jingoo Han Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, 'Richard Purdie' , 'Thierry Reding' , 'Tomi Valkeinen' , 'Laurent Pinchart' , 'Michael Hennerich' , 'Milo Kim' , 'Daniel Jeong' On Fri, 04 Oct 2013 08:50:57 +0900 Jingoo Han wrote: > On Friday, October 04, 2013 8:21 AM, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Fri, 27 Sep 2013 12:59:28 +0900 Jingoo Han wrote: > > > > > Remove Richard Purdie as backlight subsystem maintainer, since he > > > is not responding for a few years. > > > > It's nice to give a person a ./CREDITS entry when we remove them from > > ./MAINTAINERS. > > However, Richard Purdie still remains as maintainers of other two entries > as below: > In this case, is it still necessary give him a ./CREDITS entry? Necessary? No. Nice? Yes ;) I like to think that it reduces any of the sting from being removed from MAINTAINERS. Plus it is more accurate and costs nothing.