From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@gmail.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org,
Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/11] x86: sysfb: remove sysfb when probing real hw
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 16:51:16 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140123165115.GB23869@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1390486503-1504-3-git-send-email-dh.herrmann@gmail.com>
Just a couple of small nits:
* David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@gmail.com> wrote:
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/sysfb.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/sysfb.c
> @@ -33,11 +33,76 @@
> #include <linux/init.h>
> #include <linux/kernel.h>
> #include <linux/mm.h>
> +#include <linux/mutex.h>
> #include <linux/platform_data/simplefb.h>
> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> #include <linux/screen_info.h>
> #include <asm/sysfb.h>
>
> +static DEFINE_MUTEX(sysfb_lock);
> +static struct platform_device *sysfb_dev;
> +
> +int __init sysfb_register(const char *name, int id,
> + const struct resource *res, unsigned int res_num,
> + const void *data, size_t data_size)
> +{
> + struct platform_device *pd;
> + int ret = 0;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&sysfb_lock);
> + if (!sysfb_dev) {
> + pd = platform_device_register_resndata(NULL, name, id,
> + res, res_num,
> + data, data_size);
> + if (IS_ERR(pd))
> + ret = PTR_ERR(pd);
> + else
> + sysfb_dev = pd;
> + }
> + mutex_unlock(&sysfb_lock);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static bool sysfb_match(const struct apertures_struct *apert)
> +{
> + struct screen_info *si = &screen_info;
> + unsigned int i;
> + const struct aperture *a;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < apert->count; ++i) {
> + a = &apert->ranges[i];
> + if (a->base >= si->lfb_base &&
> + a->base < si->lfb_base + ((u64)si->lfb_size << 16))
> + return true;
> + if (si->lfb_base >= a->base &&
> + si->lfb_base < a->base + a->size)
> + return true;
> + }
> +
> + return false;
> +}
> +
> +/* Remove sysfb and disallow new sysfbs from now on. Can be called from any
> + * context except recursively (see also remove_conflicting_framebuffers()). */
> +void sysfb_unregister(const struct apertures_struct *apert, bool primary)
Please use the customary (multi-line) comment style:
/*
* Comment .....
* ...... goes here.
*/
specified in Documentation/CodingStyle.
> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_SYSFB
> +# include <asm/sysfb.h>
> +#endif
I guess a single space is sufficient?
Better yet, I'd include sysfb.h unconditionally:
> @@ -1773,6 +1780,10 @@ register_framebuffer(struct fb_info *fb_info)
> {
> int ret;
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_SYSFB
> + sysfb_unregister(fb_info->apertures, fb_is_primary_device(fb_info));
> +#endif
So, if a dummy sysfb_unregister() inline was defined in the
!CONFIG_X86_SYSFB case then this ugly #ifdef could possibly be
removed? Especially as it's used twice.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-23 16:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-23 14:14 [PATCH 00/11] SimpleDRM & Sysfb David Herrmann
2014-01-23 14:14 ` [PATCH 01/11] x86: sysfb: fool-proof CONFIG_X86_SYSFB David Herrmann
2014-01-23 14:14 ` [PATCH 02/11] x86: sysfb: remove sysfb when probing real hw David Herrmann
2014-01-23 16:51 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2014-01-23 17:07 ` David Herrmann
2014-01-23 17:14 ` Ingo Molnar
2014-01-23 19:09 ` David Herrmann
2014-01-24 10:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2014-01-23 14:14 ` [PATCH 03/11] fbdev: efifb: add dev->remove() callback David Herrmann
2014-01-23 14:14 ` [PATCH 04/11] fbdev: vesafb: " David Herrmann
2014-01-23 14:14 ` [PATCH 05/11] x86: sysfb: store apertures in simplefb platform-data David Herrmann
2014-01-23 14:14 ` [PATCH 06/11] video: sysfb: add generic firmware-fb interface David Herrmann
2014-01-23 14:14 ` [PATCH 07/11] drm: mgag200: remove redundant fbdev removal David Herrmann
2014-01-23 14:15 ` [PATCH 08/11] drm/i915: remove sysfbs early David Herrmann
2014-01-23 14:15 ` [PATCH 09/11] drm: add SimpleDRM driver David Herrmann
2014-01-23 14:15 ` [PATCH 10/11] drm: simpledrm: add fbdev fallback support David Herrmann
2014-01-23 14:15 ` [PATCH 11/11] x86/sysfb: allow sysfb+simpledrm combination David Herrmann
2014-01-27 22:18 ` [PATCH 00/11] SimpleDRM & Sysfb David Herrmann
2014-02-21 9:56 ` Thierry Reding
2014-03-03 10:12 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2014-03-03 10:29 ` David Herrmann
2014-03-03 10:45 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2014-03-03 11:09 ` David Herrmann
2014-03-03 11:22 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2014-03-06 12:16 ` David Herrmann
2014-03-07 12:44 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2014-03-07 13:05 ` David Herrmann
2014-03-07 13:52 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2014-03-07 14:06 ` David Herrmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140123165115.GB23869@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dh.herrmann@gmail.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=teg@jklm.no \
--cc=tomi.valkeinen@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).