From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wang YanQing Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 17:36:13 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] video: fbdev: uvesafb.c: Added additional error checking Message-Id: <20140724173613.GA2203@udknight> List-Id: References: <1406150427-26077-1-git-send-email-rickard_strandqvist@spectrumdigital.se> In-Reply-To: <1406150427-26077-1-git-send-email-rickard_strandqvist@spectrumdigital.se> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Rickard Strandqvist Cc: Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard , Tomi Valkeinen , Jingoo Han , David Fries , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Joe Perches , linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, pavel@ucw.cz On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 11:20:27PM +0200, Rickard Strandqvist wrote: > Variable was assigned a value that is never used. > Now the variable is used, and the function returns if a call to > uvesafb_exec() returns a error. Because the only user of uvesafb_vbe_getpmi in uvesafb.c don't check its return value, it should do the check indeed, so maybe below change is better: - if ((task->t.regs.eax & 0xffff) != 0x4f || task->t.regs.es < 0xc000) { + if (err || (task->t.regs.eax & 0xffff) != 0x4f || task->t.regs.es < 0xc000) { par->pmi_setpal = par->ypan = 0; } Or we check uvesafb_vbe_getpmi's return value, then the code will looks like below: if (uvesafb_vbe_getpmi(task, par)) par->pmi_setpal = par->ypan = 0; Add cc:pavel@ucw.cz, you should cc all the people who replied your patch in later patch version. Thanks.