From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Luc Verhaegen Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 12:02:58 +0000 Subject: Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 4/4] simplefb: add clock handling code Message-Id: <20140826120258.GA22395@skynet.be> List-Id: References: <20140813170106.GT15297@lukather> <20140825121228.GB4163@ulmo.nvidia.com> <20140825124410.GZ15297@lukather> <20140825133953.GJ4163@ulmo.nvidia.com> <53FB3E7F.4000503@redhat.com> <20140825141600.GA14763@ulmo.nvidia.com> <20140825145854.GA15297@lukather> <20140825150501.GE14763@ulmo.nvidia.com> <20140825150900.GB21020@skynet.be> <20140826075247.GC17263@ulmo> In-Reply-To: <20140826075247.GC17263@ulmo> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 09:52:49AM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote: > On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 05:09:00PM +0200, Luc Verhaegen wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 05:05:04PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote: > > > > > > No. simplefb just wants to write to some memory that hardware has been > > > set up to scan out. The platform requires that the clocks be on. > > > > Simplefb also requires that the memory is there and is persistent. Fine > > for discrete graphics cards, fine for rpi where most things are hidden > > from the ARM core anyway, not so fine for anybody else. > > I don't understand. This patch series isn't changing anything about the > memory aspects of the driver yet it's working for you on sunxi, isn't > it? So it can't be all that broken. > > Thierry Oh, i had to go wrestle with UBoot options and reserve 8MB off the top, which the kernel never gets told about. A nice throwback to x86 IGP bioses, a past i had thought i had left behind forgood. Luc Verhaegen.