From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] video: fbdev: omap2: omapfb: remove __exit annotation
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2014 14:41:40 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141015144140.GD10888@saruman> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <543E64EE.4070104@ti.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2729 bytes --]
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 03:13:34PM +0300, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 14/10/14 21:28, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > if we leave __exit annotation, driver can't be unbound
> > through sysfs.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/omapfb-main.c | 4 ++--
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/omapfb-main.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/omapfb-main.c
> > index ec2d132..9cbf1ce 100644
> > --- a/drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/omapfb-main.c
> > +++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/omapfb-main.c
> > @@ -2619,7 +2619,7 @@ err0:
> > return r;
> > }
> >
> > -static int __exit omapfb_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > +static int omapfb_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > {
> > struct omapfb2_device *fbdev = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> >
> > @@ -2636,7 +2636,7 @@ static int __exit omapfb_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >
> > static struct platform_driver omapfb_driver = {
> > .probe = omapfb_probe,
> > - .remove = __exit_p(omapfb_remove),
> > + .remove = omapfb_remove,
> > .driver = {
> > .name = "omapfb",
> > .owner = THIS_MODULE,
>
> Interesting. I don't know if I'm doing something funny, but without this
> patch, I can unbind omapfb, kind of.
>
> "echo omapfb > unbind" goes ok, but remove is obviously not called.
remove isn't called because it won't exist if it's built-in. Look at the
definition of __exit_p()
> Somehow omapfb device is still unbound from the driver, as I can then
> bind it again, causing probe to be called. Which breaks everything.
>
> I would've thought that unbinding is not possible if remove is missing,
> but that doesn't seem to be the case. I guess it just means that remove
> is not called when the driver & device are unbound.
if no remove it provided on platform_driver structure, platform bus
assumes you have nothing to do on your ->remove(), so you end up leaking
all resources you allocated on ->probe() (unless you *really* don't need
to do anything on ->remove).
> We have 18 __exit_p()s in omapdss and related drivers. I guess they are
> all broken the same way.
yup, I should've grepped.
> Note that omapfb unbind & bind does not work even with this patch, but
> results in a crash as some old state is left into omapdss. The same
> happens also with unloading and loading omapfb module (but keeping
> omapdss module loaded).
It worked fine for me. I unbound and bound omapfb multiple times.
> So there seems to be more issues around this.
quite a few more, I'd say
--
balbi
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-15 14:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-14 18:28 [PATCH 1/3] video: fbdev: omap2: omapfb: remove __exit annotation Felipe Balbi
2014-10-14 18:28 ` [PATCH 2/3] video: fbdev: omap2: omapfb: add missing MODULE_ALIAS() Felipe Balbi
2014-10-14 18:34 ` Felipe Balbi
2014-10-15 12:46 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2014-10-15 14:37 ` Felipe Balbi
2014-10-15 12:20 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2014-10-15 14:38 ` Felipe Balbi
2014-10-15 15:45 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2014-10-14 18:28 ` [PATCH 3/3] arm: boot: dts: am437x-sk: fix lcd enable pin mux data Felipe Balbi
2014-10-15 12:24 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2014-12-04 14:43 ` Felipe Balbi
2014-12-04 15:05 ` Felipe Balbi
2014-10-15 12:13 ` [PATCH 1/3] video: fbdev: omap2: omapfb: remove __exit annotation Tomi Valkeinen
2014-10-15 14:41 ` Felipe Balbi [this message]
2014-10-15 15:43 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2014-10-15 15:54 ` Felipe Balbi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141015144140.GD10888@saruman \
--to=balbi@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).