From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bjorn Helgaas Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 17:40:08 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/4] pci: add pci_iomap_wc() variants Message-Id: <20150526174008.GN32152@google.com> List-Id: References: <1432163293-20965-1-git-send-email-mcgrof@do-not-panic.com> <1432163293-20965-2-git-send-email-mcgrof@do-not-panic.com> <20150521223321.GG32152@google.com> <20150522002341.GM23057@wotan.suse.de> In-Reply-To: <20150522002341.GM23057@wotan.suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" Cc: "Luis R. Rodriguez" , tomi.valkeinen@ti.com, airlied@linux.ie, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, luto@amacapital.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Toshi Kani , Suresh Siddha , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , Juergen Gross , Daniel Vetter , Dave Airlie , Antonino Daplas , Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard , Dave Hansen , Arnd Bergmann , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com, Stefan Bader , Ville =?iso-8859-1?Q?Syrj=E4l=E4?= , Mel Gorman , Vlastimil Babka , Borislav Petkov , Davidlohr Bueso , konrad.wilk@oracle.com, ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com, david.vrabel@citrix.com, jbeulich@suse.com, Roger Pau =?iso-8859-1?Q?Monn=E9?= On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 02:23:41AM +0200, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 05:33:21PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > > > I tentatively put this (and the rest of the series) on a pci/resource > > branch. I'm hoping you'll propose some clarification about > > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(). > > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL() also serves to ensure only GPL modules can > only run that code. So for instance although we have "Dual BSD/GPL" > tags for modules pure "BSD" tags do not exist for module tags and > cannot run EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL() code [0]. Also there is some folks > who do believe tha at run time all kernel modules are GPL [1] [2]. > And to be precise even though the FSF may claim a list of licenses > are GPL-compatible we cannot rely on this list alone for our own > goals and if folks want to use our EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL()s they must > discuss this on lkml [2]. By "propose some clarification," I meant that I hoped you would propose a patch to Documentation/ that would give maintainers some guidance. > ...