From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lee Jones Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2015 13:42:10 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] video: fbdev: imxfb: Constify platform_device_id Message-Id: <20150603134210.GC12304@x1> List-Id: References: <1430494721-30793-1-git-send-email-k.kozlowski.k@gmail.com> <1430494721-30793-2-git-send-email-k.kozlowski.k@gmail.com> <20150505082807.GV4047@x1> <556EE743.5030405@ti.com> <20150603115050.GB12304@x1> <556EEABD.6020902@ti.com> In-Reply-To: <556EEABD.6020902@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org On Wed, 03 Jun 2015, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > On 03/06/15 14:50, Lee Jones wrote: > > On Wed, 03 Jun 2015, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > >=20 > >> Hi Lee, > >> > >> On 05/05/15 11:28, Lee Jones wrote: > >>> On Sat, 02 May 2015, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > >>> > >>>> The platform_device_id is not modified by the driver and core uses i= t as > >>>> const. > >>>> > >>>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski > >>>> --- > >>>> drivers/video/fbdev/imxfb.c | 2 +- > >>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > >>> > >>> Applied, thanks. > >> > >> You applied the fbdev changes in this series also, not only the > >> backlight changes? > >=20 > > Ah, yes I did. I assumed they were all due for Backlight. > >=20 > > Would you like me to un-apply the non-Backlight patches? >=20 > If you can easily remove them, yes. >=20 > But chances for conflict are quite minimal, so if you already have a > pile of commits on top of these, it's fine if they go via backlight tree. I can easily remove them, no problem. Consider them unapplied. --=20 Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org =E2=94=82 Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog