From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Boris Brezillon Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 18:26:59 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/12] pwm: add support for atomic update Message-Id: <20151110192659.3eaa800c@bbrezillon> List-Id: References: <1442828009-6241-1-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> <2341981.a79ioYM9Es@diego> <20151110173416.GB21727@ulmo> In-Reply-To: <20151110173416.GB21727@ulmo> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Hi Thierry, On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 18:34:16 +0100 Thierry Reding wrote: > On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 12:12:12PM +0200, Heiko St=C3=BCbner wrote: > > Hi Thierry, > >=20 > > Am Montag, 21. September 2015, 11:33:17 schrieb Boris Brezillon: > > > Hello, > > >=20 > > > This series adds support for atomic PWM update, or IOW, the capability > > > to update all the parameters of a PWM device (enabled/disabled, perio= d, > > > duty and polarity) in one go. > >=20 > > is anything more blocking this series? It's now sitting on the lists fo= r=20 > > nearly a month and everybody seems happy with it, so it would be really= nice=20 > > to have in mainline :-) . > >=20 > > Especially as this also makes it possible for Rockchip Chromebooks to a= ctually=20 > > control the logic-regulator that is implemented as pwm-regulator there. >=20 > Last time I tried to put this into linux-next I got immediately > bombarded by a number of build failures, so I backed things out. The > current plan is to give this another try after v4.4-rc1. Could you paste the build failures (I didn't receive any notification)? BTW, I just rebased my branch on pwm/for-next and it seems to compile correctly, but maybe you're compiling on more platforms (or different drivers than I do). Best Regards, Boris --=20 Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com