From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2016 11:02:03 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/12] pwm: add support for atomic update Message-Id: <20160204110203.GL4455@sirena.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="LR9UEBmNK407lwl9" List-Id: References: <1442828009-6241-1-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> <2341981.a79ioYM9Es@diego> <20151110173416.GB21727@ulmo> <20160125170855.GA10182@ulmo> <20160203145337.GD9650@ulmo> In-Reply-To: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org --LR9UEBmNK407lwl9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 11:04:20AM -0800, Doug Anderson wrote: > Sure. ...but you agree that somehow you need a new API call for this, > right? Somehow the PWM regulator needs to be able to say that it > wants the hardware state, not the initial state as specified in the > device tree. Wouldn't the most direct way to do that be to just not specify anything in the DT? If there *is* something in DT but we ignore it that's a bit weird. --LR9UEBmNK407lwl9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWsy+qAAoJECTWi3JdVIfQasQH/jly2TuqsSN80W79jFE40xcP EjcALazQvBo6F7kQRHkoN7oOkWy296LiyTlZwmDsbTZ9B+LK9UEKXEbXIwVlLQwl eEa+15AX+Ie3hadCAesTlNu53xBD7tSgmSnDuW8KZOhA0muY3pXphZ7ALzf5YbjJ dOXSegG8NkdfoIpf0WUn9Q77BlH+ElKY/bqUu+qa486oGf4WNXqRBxnvUjQON8jG wnWeWpSTRJLv2NHh/dE1FpTtLGySioUEUsQGa9A4/AgL4eABrHkyVQ8UPdcOTjtC 2D6RCtFzyPCPwaiOd2MgKWE2eIrPU+rFTH6Fytb0Q01k29XPB5SeqjEMDzaOKNM= =TeUF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --LR9UEBmNK407lwl9--