From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Baole Ni Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2016 12:07:31 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 1006/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro Message-Id: <20160802120731.17151-1-baolex.ni@intel.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: plagnioj@jcrosoft.com, tomi.valkeinen@ti.com, m.chehab@samsung.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, m.szyprowski@samsung.com, kyungmin.park@samsung.com, k.kozlowski@samsung.com Cc: linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch, khoroshilov@ispras.ru, chuansheng.liu@intel.com, baolex.ni@intel.com, mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com, stern@rowland.harvard.edu, oneukum@suse.com I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code, thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro. Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu Signed-off-by: Baole Ni --- drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbmem.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbmem.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbmem.c index 76c1ad9..e597464 100644 --- a/drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbmem.c +++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbmem.c @@ -1609,7 +1609,7 @@ static int do_remove_conflicting_framebuffers(struct apertures_struct *a, } static bool lockless_register_fb; -module_param_named_unsafe(lockless_register_fb, lockless_register_fb, bool, 0400); +module_param_named_unsafe(lockless_register_fb, lockless_register_fb, bool, S_IRUSR); MODULE_PARM_DESC(lockless_register_fb, "Lockless framebuffer registration for debugging [default=off]"); -- 2.9.2