From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
To: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
mhocko@suse.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>,
linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/page_alloc: Wait for oom_lock before retrying.
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 14:18:44 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170112141844.GA20462@pathway.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161226113407.GA515@tigerII.localdomain>
On Mon 2016-12-26 20:34:07, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> console_trylock() used to always forbid rescheduling; but it got changed
> like a yaer ago.
>
> the other thing is... do we really need to console_conditional_schedule()
> from fbcon_*()? console_unlock() does cond_resched() after every line it
> prints. wouldn't that be enough?
>
> so may be we can drop some of console_conditional_schedule()
> call sites in fbcon. or update console_conditional_schedule()
> function to always return the current preemption value, not the
> one we saw in console_trylock().
I was curious if it makes sense to remove
console_conditional_schedule() completely.
In practice, it never allows rescheduling when the console driver
is called via console_unlock(). It is since 2006 and the commit
78944e549d36673eb62 ("vt: printk: Fix framebuffer console
triggering might_sleep assertion"). This commit added
that
console_may_schedule = 0;
into console_unlock() before the console drivers are called.
On the other hand, it seems that the rescheduling was always
enabled when some console operations were called via
tty_operations. For example:
struct tty_operations con_ops
con_ops->con_write()
-> do_con_write() #calls console_lock()
-> do_con_trol()
-> fbcon_scroll()
-> fbcon_redraw_move()
-> console_conditional_schedule()
, where console_lock() sets console_may_schedule = 1;
A complete console scroll/redraw might take a while. The rescheduling
would make sense => IMHO, we should keep console_conditional_schedule()
or some alternative in the console drivers as well.
But I am afraid that we could not use the automatic detection.
We are not able to detect preemption when CONFIG_PREEMPT_COUNT
is disabled. But we still would like to enable rescheduling
when called from the tty code (guarded by console_lock()).
As a result. We should keep console_may_schedule as a global
variable. We cannot put the automatic detection into
console_conditional_schedule(). Instead, we need to
fix handling of the global variable in console_unlock().
I am going to prepare a patch for this.
Best Regards,
Petr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-12 14:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20161220153948.GA575@tigerII.localdomain>
[not found] ` <201612221927.BGE30207.OSFJMFLFOHQtOV@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
[not found] ` <20161222134250.GE413@tigerII.localdomain>
[not found] ` <201612222301.AFG57832.QOFMSVFOJHLOtF@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
[not found] ` <20161222140930.GF413@tigerII.localdomain>
[not found] ` <201612261954.FJE69201.OFLVtFJSQFOHMO@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
2016-12-26 11:34 ` [PATCH] mm/page_alloc: Wait for oom_lock before retrying Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-01-12 13:10 ` Petr Mladek
2017-01-13 2:52 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-01-13 3:53 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-01-13 11:15 ` Petr Mladek
2017-01-13 11:14 ` Petr Mladek
2017-01-12 14:18 ` Petr Mladek [this message]
2017-01-13 2:28 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-01-13 11:03 ` Petr Mladek
2017-01-13 11:50 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-01-13 12:15 ` Petr Mladek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170112141844.GA20462@pathway.suse.cz \
--to=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jslaby@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
--cc=sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com \
--cc=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).