From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sergey Senozhatsky Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2017 03:53:07 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/page_alloc: Wait for oom_lock before retrying. Message-Id: <20170113035307.GD9360@jagdpanzerIV.localdomain> List-Id: References: <20161220153948.GA575@tigerII.localdomain> <201612221927.BGE30207.OSFJMFLFOHQtOV@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> <20161222134250.GE413@tigerII.localdomain> <201612222301.AFG57832.QOFMSVFOJHLOtF@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> <20161222140930.GF413@tigerII.localdomain> <201612261954.FJE69201.OFLVtFJSQFOHMO@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> <20161226113407.GA515@tigerII.localdomain> <20170112131017.GF14894@pathway.suse.cz> <20170113025212.GB9360@jagdpanzerIV.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <20170113025212.GB9360@jagdpanzerIV.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Sergey Senozhatsky Cc: Petr Mladek , Sergey Senozhatsky , Tetsuo Handa , mhocko@suse.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman , Jiri Slaby , linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On (01/13/17 11:52), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: [..] > and we really don't want to cond_resched() when we are in panic. > that's why console_flush_on_panic() sets it to zero explicitly. > > console_trylock() checks oops_in_progress, so re-taking the semaphore > when we are in > > panic() > console_flush_on_panic() > console_unlock() > console_trylock() > > should be OK. as well as doing get_console_conditional_schedule() somewhere > in console driver code. d'oh... no, this is false. console_flush_on_panic() is called after we bust_spinlocks(0), BUT with local IRQs disabled. so console_trylock() would still set console_may_schedule to 0. -ss