From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
To: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
mhocko@suse.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>,
linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/page_alloc: Wait for oom_lock before retrying.
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2017 11:14:49 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170113111449.GI14894@pathway.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170113025212.GB9360@jagdpanzerIV.localdomain>
On Fri 2017-01-13 11:52:55, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (01/12/17 14:10), Petr Mladek wrote:
> [..]
> > > /**
> > > * console_lock - lock the console system for exclusive use.
> > > *
> > > @@ -2316,7 +2321,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(console_unlock);
> > > */
> > > void __sched console_conditional_schedule(void)
> > > {
> > > - if (console_may_schedule)
> > > + if (get_console_may_schedule())
> >
> > Note that console_may_schedule should be zero when
> > the console drivers are called. See the following lines in
> > console_unlock():
> >
> > /*
> > * Console drivers are called under logbuf_lock, so
> > * @console_may_schedule should be cleared before; however, we may
> > * end up dumping a lot of lines, for example, if called from
> > * console registration path, and should invoke cond_resched()
> > * between lines if allowable. Not doing so can cause a very long
> > * scheduling stall on a slow console leading to RCU stall and
> > * softlockup warnings which exacerbate the issue with more
> > * messages practically incapacitating the system.
> > */
> > do_cond_resched = console_may_schedule;
> > console_may_schedule = 0;
>
>
>
> console drivers are never-ever-ever getting called under logbuf lock.
> never. with disabled local IRQs - yes. under logbuf lock - no. that
> would soft lockup systems in really bad ways, otherwise.
Sure. It is just a misleading comment that someone wrote. I have
already fixed this in my patch.
> the reason why we set console_may_schedule to zero in
> console_unlock() is.... VT. and lf() function in particular.
>
> commit 78944e549d36673eb6265a2411574e79c28e23dc
> Author: Antonino A. Daplas XXXX
> Date: Sat Aug 5 12:14:16 2006 -0700
>
> [PATCH] vt: printk: Fix framebuffer console triggering might_sleep assertion
>
> Reported by: Dave Jones
>
> Whilst printk'ing to both console and serial console, I got this...
> (2.6.18rc1)
>
> BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/sched.c:4438
> in_atomic():0, irqs_disabled():1
This is basically the same problem that Testuo has. This commit added
the line
console_may_schedule = 0;
Tetsuo found that we did not clear it when going back
via the "again:" goto target.
> and we really don't want to cond_resched() when we are in panic.
> that's why console_flush_on_panic() sets it to zero explicitly.
This actually works even with the bug. console_flush_on_panic()
is called with interrupts disabled in panic(). Therefore
console_trylock would disable cond_resched.
Best Regards,
Petr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-13 11:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20161220153948.GA575@tigerII.localdomain>
[not found] ` <201612221927.BGE30207.OSFJMFLFOHQtOV@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
[not found] ` <20161222134250.GE413@tigerII.localdomain>
[not found] ` <201612222301.AFG57832.QOFMSVFOJHLOtF@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
[not found] ` <20161222140930.GF413@tigerII.localdomain>
[not found] ` <201612261954.FJE69201.OFLVtFJSQFOHMO@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
2016-12-26 11:34 ` [PATCH] mm/page_alloc: Wait for oom_lock before retrying Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-01-12 13:10 ` Petr Mladek
2017-01-13 2:52 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-01-13 3:53 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-01-13 11:15 ` Petr Mladek
2017-01-13 11:14 ` Petr Mladek [this message]
2017-01-12 14:18 ` Petr Mladek
2017-01-13 2:28 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-01-13 11:03 ` Petr Mladek
2017-01-13 11:50 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-01-13 12:15 ` Petr Mladek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170113111449.GI14894@pathway.suse.cz \
--to=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jslaby@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
--cc=sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com \
--cc=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).