From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>,
linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] printk: Correctly handle preemption in console_unlock()
Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2017 14:30:11 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170202093011.1e067ea7@gandalf.local.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1485353325-26591-1-git-send-email-pmladek@suse.com>
On Wed, 25 Jan 2017 15:08:45 +0100
Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> wrote:
> diff --git a/kernel/printk/printk.c b/kernel/printk/printk.c
> index 7180088cbb23..cc90c0a5ae21 100644
> --- a/kernel/printk/printk.c
> +++ b/kernel/printk/printk.c
> @@ -2158,19 +2158,18 @@ void console_unlock(void)
> }
>
> /*
> - * Console drivers are called under logbuf_lock, so
> - * @console_may_schedule should be cleared before; however, we may
> - * end up dumping a lot of lines, for example, if called from
> - * console registration path, and should invoke cond_resched()
> - * between lines if allowable. Not doing so can cause a very long
> - * scheduling stall on a slow console leading to RCU stall and
> - * softlockup warnings which exacerbate the issue with more
> - * messages practically incapacitating the system.
Why did you remove the comment about invoking cond_resched()? It's
still pertinent to the code, as there still exists a:
if (do_cond_resched)
cond_resched();
And the rational in the comment is still correct.
-- Steve
> + * Console drivers are called with interrupts disabled, so
> + * @console_may_schedule must be cleared before. The original
> + * value must be stored so that we could schedule between lines.
> + *
> + * console_trylock() is not able to detect the preemtible
> + * context reliably. Therefore the value must be stored before
> + * and cleared after the the "again" goto label.
> */
> do_cond_resched = console_may_schedule;
> +again:
> console_may_schedule = 0;
>
> -again:
> /*
> * We released the console_sem lock, so we need to recheck if
> * cpu is online and (if not) is there at least one CON_ANYTIME
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-02 14:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-25 14:08 [PATCH v2] printk: Correctly handle preemption in console_unlock() Petr Mladek
2017-02-02 13:31 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-02-02 14:30 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2017-02-02 16:40 ` Petr Mladek
2017-03-24 16:14 ` [PATCH v3] " Petr Mladek
2017-03-24 23:57 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170202093011.1e067ea7@gandalf.local.home \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jslaby@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).