Re: [PATCH 3/3] mfd: twl: move header file out of I2C realm

[Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>]

On Sun, 13 Aug 2017, Wolfram Sang wrote:

> On Thu, Jul 06, 2017 at 08:03:52AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Thu, 06 Jul 2017, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > 
> > > On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 12:02:10AM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > > > include/linux/i2c is not for client devices. Move the header file to a
> > > > more appropriate location.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
> > > > ---
> > > >  arch/arm/mach-omap2/common.h            | 2 +-
> > > >  arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_twl.c          | 2 +-
> > > >  drivers/gpio/gpio-twl4030.c             | 2 +-
> > > >  drivers/iio/adc/twl4030-madc.c          | 2 +-
> > > >  drivers/iio/adc/twl6030-gpadc.c         | 2 +-
> > > >  drivers/input/keyboard/twl4030_keypad.c | 2 +-
> > > >  drivers/input/misc/twl4030-pwrbutton.c  | 2 +-
> > > >  drivers/input/misc/twl4030-vibra.c      | 2 +-
> > > >  drivers/mfd/twl-core.c                  | 6 +++---
> > > >  drivers/mfd/twl4030-audio.c             | 2 +-
> > > >  drivers/mfd/twl4030-irq.c               | 2 +-
> > > >  drivers/mfd/twl4030-power.c             | 2 +-
> > > >  drivers/mfd/twl6030-irq.c               | 2 +-
> > > >  drivers/phy/phy-twl4030-usb.c           | 2 +-
> > > >  drivers/power/supply/twl4030_charger.c  | 2 +-
> > > >  drivers/pwm/pwm-twl-led.c               | 2 +-
> > > >  drivers/pwm/pwm-twl.c                   | 2 +-
> > > >  drivers/regulator/twl-regulator.c       | 2 +-
> > > >  drivers/regulator/twl6030-regulator.c   | 2 +-
> > > >  drivers/rtc/rtc-twl.c                   | 2 +-
> > > >  drivers/usb/phy/phy-twl6030-usb.c       | 2 +-
> > > >  drivers/video/backlight/pandora_bl.c    | 2 +-
> > > >  drivers/watchdog/twl4030_wdt.c          | 2 +-
> > > >  include/linux/{i2c => mfd}/twl.h        | 0
> > > >  sound/soc/codecs/twl4030.c              | 2 +-
> > > >  25 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
> > > >  rename include/linux/{i2c => mfd}/twl.h (100%)
> > > 
> > > I didn't see this get applied yet, so just in case anyone was waiting
> > > for me (this is trivial, so I don't think there's a need):
> > 
> > You're not the last. :)
> 
> Given the triviality of the change for non-MFD subsystems, can we apply
> this for 4.14?

I can't apply anything without Acks for *all* of the subsystems above.

As you well know, it is the submitters responsibility to obtain them.

My suggestion would be to collect the Acks you've received up until
this point and identify which SS's are still lacking in change log
section of a RESEND.

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog