From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tony Lindgren Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2017 16:22:20 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] mfd: twl: move header file out of I2C realm Message-Id: <20170814162219.GX8569@atomide.com> List-Id: References: <20170521220212.1404-1-wsa@the-dreams.de> <20170521220212.1404-4-wsa@the-dreams.de> <20170706064453.GH16144@ulmo.fritz.box> <20170706070352.xdecvsnremwqed72@dell> <20170813133700.tv4ka7anvbzcplr7@ninjato> <20170814064247.qvggx4ito4vgjqvs@dell> <20170814084340.65morabelapfegph@ninjato> In-Reply-To: <20170814084340.65morabelapfegph@ninjato> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Wolfram Sang Cc: Lee Jones , Thierry Reding , linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Russell King , Linus Walleij , Alexandre Courbot , Jonathan Cameron , Hartmut Knaack , Lars-Peter Clausen , Peter Meerwald-Stadler , Dmitry Torokhov , Kishon Vijay Abraham I , Sebastian Reichel , Liam Girdwood , Mark Brown , Alessandro Zummo , Alexandre Belloni , Felipe Balbi , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Daniel Thompson , Jingoo Han , Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz * Wolfram Sang [170814 01:43]: > > > > Given the triviality of the change for non-MFD subsystems, can we apply > > > this for 4.14? > > > > I can't apply anything without Acks for *all* of the subsystems above. > > Well, there are cases when you can. Those should be exceptions and well > justified, of course. > > > My suggestion would be to collect the Acks you've received up until > > this point and identify which SS's are still lacking in change log > > section of a RESEND. > > I agree, though, that I can try a second round to get the acks. As long as it's been compile tested with omap2plus_defconfig: Acked-by: Tony Lindgren