From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Thompson Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2017 16:57:36 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add support for ORISE OTM3225A LCD SoC Message-Id: <20171220165736.e247aggbkl4qir23@oak.lan> List-Id: References: <1509714581-4065-1-git-send-email-fb@ltec.ch> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Felix Brack Cc: linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, lee.jones@linaro.org, jingoohan1@gmail.com, b.zolnierkie@samsung.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 05:35:24PM +0100, Felix Brack wrote: > Just a gentle echo request ;-) > Is there something completely wrong with this patch or am I just too > impatient? > > regards Felix > > On 03.11.2017 14:09, Felix Brack wrote: > > This patch adds a LCD driver supporting the OTM3225A LCD SoC > > from ORISE Technology. This device can drive TFT LC panels having a > > resolution of 240x320 pixels. After initializing the OTM3225A using > > it's SPI interface it switches to use 16-bib RGB as external > > display interface. Was this a backlight driver? I've just noticed all the backlight maintainers on Cc: but the subject doesn't make this obvious and even with you quoting the patch header I still can't be entirely sure! As a result I think its very likely the patch simply got overlooked because it didn't look much like a backlight driver when filtering e-mail. Patches that can't be easily categorized from the subject line will often get overlooked. So, asssuming this was a backlight driver, could you resend the patch with an updated description and a subject line commenting: [PATCH] backlight: otm3225a: Daniel.