From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Thompson Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2018 16:26:44 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] backlight: pwm_bl: don't use GPIOF_* with gpiod_get_direction Message-Id: <20180413162644.bej6yrgmqc2y3nfe@holly.lan> List-Id: References: <20180410123241.25745-1-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> <20180411073215.fzvh4ejj2kd7wam3@verge.net.au> <20180413160824.GD31310@phenom.ffwll.local> In-Reply-To: <20180413160824.GD31310@phenom.ffwll.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Simon Horman , Wolfram Sang , linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , Jingoo Han , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, Thierry Reding , linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, Lee Jones On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 06:08:24PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 09:32:16AM +0200, Simon Horman wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 02:32:40PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > > The documentation was wrong, gpiod_get_direction() returns 0/1 instead > > > of the GPIOF_* flags. The docs were fixed with commit 94fc73094abe47 > > > ("gpio: correct docs about return value of gpiod_get_direction"). Now, > > > fix this user (until a better, system-wide solution is in place). > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang > > > Acked-by: Daniel Thompson > > > > Reviewed-by: Simon Horman > > > > > --- > > > > > > Changes since V1: > > > * rebased to top-of-linus-tree > > > * added tag from Daniel, thanks! > > > > > > Through which tree does this need to go? > > I think Daniel Thompson has one ... Sorry, I didn't spot the question at the bottom of the change block. For backlight patches generally go though Lee Jones' tree. Daniel.