From: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
To: "Michal Vokáč" <michal.vokac@ysoft.com>
Cc: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org,
Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>,
Adam Ford <aford173@gmail.com>,
linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
kernel@pengutronix.de, Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@gmail.com>,
Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@collabora.com>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] backlight: pwm_bl: configure pwm only once per backlight toggle
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2019 10:11:16 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191017101116.3d5okxmto5coecad@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c89925bd-857d-874f-b74f-c5700d4c9fbd@ysoft.com>
On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 11:48:08AM +0200, Michal Vokáč wrote:
> On 17. 10. 19 10:10, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > A previous change in the pwm core (namely 01ccf903edd6 ("pwm: Let
> > pwm_get_state() return the last implemented state")) changed the
> > semantic of pwm_get_state() and disclosed an (as it seems) common
> > problem in lowlevel PWM drivers. By not relying on the period and duty
> > cycle being retrievable from a disabled PWM this type of problem is
> > worked around.
> >
> > Apart from this issue only calling the pwm_get_state/pwm_apply_state
> > combo once is also more effective.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
> > ---
> > Hello,
> >
> > There are now two reports about 01ccf903edd6 breaking a backlight. As
> > far as I understand the problem this is a combination of the backend pwm
> > driver yielding surprising results and the pwm-bl driver doing things
> > more complicated than necessary.
> >
> > So I guess this patch works around these problems. Still it would be
> > interesting to find out the details in the imx driver that triggers the
> > problem. So Adam, can you please instrument the pwm-imx27 driver to
> > print *state at the beginning of pwm_imx27_apply() and the end of
> > pwm_imx27_get_state() and provide the results?
> >
> > Note I only compile tested this change.
>
> Hi Uwe,
> I was just about to respond to the "pwm_bl on i.MX6Q broken on 5.4-RC1+"
> thread that I have a similar problem when you submitted this patch.
>
> So here are my few cents:
>
> My setup is as follows:
> - imx6dl-yapp4-draco with i.MX6Solo
> - backlight is controlled with inverted PWM signal
> - max brightness level = 32, default brightness level set to 32 in DT.
>
> 1. Almost correct backlight behavior before 01ccf903edd6 ("pwm: Let
> pwm_get_state() return the last implemented state):
>
> - System boots to userspace and backlight is enabled all the time from
> power up.
>
> $ dmesg | grep state
> [ 1.763381] get state end: -1811360608, enabled: 0
What is -1811360608? When I wrote "print *state" above, I thought about
something like:
pr_info("%s: period: %u, duty: %u, polarity: %d, enabled: %d",
__func__, state->period, state->duty_cycle, state->polarity, state->enabled);
A quick look into drivers/pwm/pwm-imx27.c shows that this is another
driver that yields duty_cycle = 0 when the hardware is off.
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-17 10:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-17 8:10 [PATCH] backlight: pwm_bl: configure pwm only once per backlight toggle Uwe Kleine-König
2019-10-17 9:48 ` Michal Vokáč
2019-10-17 10:11 ` Uwe Kleine-König [this message]
2019-10-17 11:11 ` Thierry Reding
2019-10-17 12:09 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2019-10-17 12:59 ` Thierry Reding
2019-10-17 13:58 ` Michal Vokáč
2019-10-17 15:14 ` Thierry Reding
2019-10-17 17:07 ` Adam Ford
2019-10-17 17:13 ` Thierry Reding
2019-10-17 17:44 ` Adam Ford
2019-10-18 9:36 ` Michal Vokáč
2019-10-23 14:16 ` Adam Ford
2019-10-23 14:23 ` Fabio Estevam
2019-10-23 15:05 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2019-10-17 20:25 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2019-10-17 19:44 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2019-10-17 13:30 ` Adam Ford
2019-10-17 13:59 ` Adam Ford
2019-10-17 10:59 ` Michal Vokáč
2019-10-17 20:19 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2019-10-17 11:47 ` Daniel Thompson
2019-10-17 12:19 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2019-10-17 12:34 ` Adam Ford
2019-10-17 12:40 ` Adam Ford
2019-10-17 13:05 ` Thierry Reding
2019-10-17 13:09 ` Adam Ford
2019-10-17 13:18 ` Daniel Thompson
2019-10-17 18:28 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2019-10-17 12:53 ` Adam Ford
2019-10-17 14:51 ` Adam Ford
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191017101116.3d5okxmto5coecad@pengutronix.de \
--to=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
--cc=aford173@gmail.com \
--cc=daniel.thompson@linaro.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=enric.balletbo@collabora.com \
--cc=jingoohan1@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michal.vokac@ysoft.com \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox