From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Guru Das Srinagesh Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 18:12:42 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 12/13] backlight: pwm_bl: Use 64-bit division macros for period and duty cycle Message-Id: <20200310181242.GA31738@codeaurora.org> List-Id: References: <20200310143432.cfjlqac5x6oinshj@holly.lan> In-Reply-To: <20200310143432.cfjlqac5x6oinshj@holly.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Daniel Thompson Cc: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, Uwe =?utf-8?Q?Kleine-K=C3=B6nig?= , Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , Jingoo Han , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Thierry Reding , Subbaraman Narayanamurthy , Lee Jones On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 02:34:32PM +0000, Daniel Thompson wrote: > This patch looks like it is a tiny change to get the pwm_backlight to > perform 64-bit division. Most of the above text is completely irrelevant > to the change contained in this patch. No need to justify the change in > the PWM structures here since that can go in the patch that changes > those structures. Just describe what this patch does, perhaps something > like the following: > > The PWM API will shortly switch the state.period and > state.duty_cycle fields to 64-bit values. Make pwm_bl > ready for this transition by adopting 64-bit division > macros. Will update the commit text accordingly. > Also please copy the backlight maintainers into the covering letter. It > is useful to place patches like this into context. Will do. Thank you. Guru Das.