From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lee Jones Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 14:24:41 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 10/12] backlight: pwm_bl: Use 64-bit division function Message-Id: <20200324142441.GD442973@dell> List-Id: References: <17fc1dcf8b9b392d1e37dc7e3e67409e3c502840.1584667964.git.gurus@codeaurora.org> <20200320133123.GD5477@dell> <20200324110710.GL5477@dell> <20200324125735.2mjuvbxt5bpon2ft@pengutronix.de> <20200324130410.dwlg767ku6kwequv@holly.lan> In-Reply-To: <20200324130410.dwlg767ku6kwequv@holly.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit To: Daniel Thompson Cc: Guru Das Srinagesh , linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, Jingoo Han , Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Thierry Reding , Uwe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig?= , Subbaraman Narayanamurthy On Tue, 24 Mar 2020, Daniel Thompson wrote: > On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 01:57:35PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > > Hello Lee, > > > > On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 11:07:10AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote: > > > On Fri, 20 Mar 2020, Lee Jones wrote: > > > > > > > On Thu, 19 Mar 2020, Guru Das Srinagesh wrote: > > > > > > > > > Since the PWM framework is switching struct pwm_state.period's datatype > > > > > to u64, prepare for this transition by using div_u64 to handle a 64-bit > > > > > dividend instead of a straight division operation. > > > > > > > > > > Cc: Lee Jones > > > > > Cc: Daniel Thompson > > > > > Cc: Jingoo Han > > > > > Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz > > > > > Cc: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org > > > > > Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org > > > > > Cc: linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Guru Das Srinagesh > > > > > Reviewed-by: Daniel Thompson > > > > > --- > > > > > drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c | 3 ++- > > > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > > > Can this patch be taken on its own? > > > > > > Hellooooo ... > > > > Conceptually it can. As the last patch depends on this one (and the > > others) some coordination might be beneficial. But that's up to Thierry > > to decide how (and if) he want this series to be applied. > > ... and on the backlight side we definitely need to know about the "if" > otherwise there's no point in taking it. Right. I'm happy to wait for Thierry. Although this isn't the only set he's currently blocking. Is he okay? On holiday perhaps? -- Lee Jones [李琼斯] Linaro Services Technical Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog