From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Guru Das Srinagesh Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2020 17:55:27 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 09/11] backlight: pwm_bl: Use 64-bit division function Message-Id: <20200416175527.GA21388@codeaurora.org> List-Id: References: <20200416094420.GB2167633@dell> In-Reply-To: <20200416094420.GB2167633@dell> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Lee Jones Cc: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, Daniel Thompson , David Collins , Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , Jingoo Han , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Thierry Reding , linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, Uwe =?utf-8?Q?Kleine-K=C3=B6nig?= , Subbaraman Narayanamurthy On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 10:44:20AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > On Wed, 08 Apr 2020, Guru Das Srinagesh wrote: > > > Since the PWM framework is switching struct pwm_state.period's datatype > > to u64, prepare for this transition by using div_u64 to handle a 64-bit > > dividend instead of a straight division operation. > > > > Cc: Lee Jones > > Cc: Daniel Thompson > > Cc: Jingoo Han > > Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz > > Cc: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org > > Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org > > Cc: linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org > > > > Signed-off-by: Guru Das Srinagesh > > Reviewed-by: Daniel Thompson > > --- > > drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c | 3 ++- > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > I see that this is part of a large set, but the remainder of the > patches have been hidden from me. Sorry about that, the full series is here: [1]. > Does this mean I can apply this patch on its own? I'll defer to Uwe on this point as I am not sure of the implications of taking in this single patch and not the entire series. Thank you. Guru Das. [1] https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-pwm/msg12131.html