From: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
To: "Maíra Canal" <maira.canal@usp.br>
Cc: lee.jones@linaro.org, jingoohan1@gmail.com,
thierry.reding@gmail.com, u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] backlight: lp855x: Switch to atomic PWM API
Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2021 16:00:00 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211102160000.kvi6hhhgdjowgnft@maple.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YX/pWeXPv1bykg2g@fedora>
On Mon, Nov 01, 2021 at 10:19:21AM -0300, Maíra Canal wrote:
> Remove legacy PWM interface (pwm_config, pwm_enable, pwm_disable) and
> replace it for the atomic PWM API.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maíra Canal <maira.canal@usp.br>
> ---
> V1 -> V2: Initialize variable and simply conditional loop
> V2 -> V3: Fix assignment of NULL variable
> V3 -> V4: Replace division for pwm_set_relative_duty_cycle
> ---
> drivers/video/backlight/lp855x_bl.c | 20 ++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/video/backlight/lp855x_bl.c b/drivers/video/backlight/lp855x_bl.c
> index e94932c69f54..bbf24564082a 100644
> --- a/drivers/video/backlight/lp855x_bl.c
> +++ b/drivers/video/backlight/lp855x_bl.c
> @@ -233,9 +233,8 @@ static int lp855x_configure(struct lp855x *lp)
>
> static void lp855x_pwm_ctrl(struct lp855x *lp, int br, int max_br)
> {
> - unsigned int period = lp->pdata->period_ns;
> - unsigned int duty = br * period / max_br;
> struct pwm_device *pwm;
> + struct pwm_state state;
>
> /* request pwm device with the consumer name */
> if (!lp->pwm) {
> @@ -245,18 +244,15 @@ static void lp855x_pwm_ctrl(struct lp855x *lp, int br, int max_br)
>
> lp->pwm = pwm;
>
> - /*
> - * FIXME: pwm_apply_args() should be removed when switching to
> - * the atomic PWM API.
> - */
> - pwm_apply_args(pwm);
> + pwm_init_state(lp->pwm, &state);
> + state.period = lp->pdata->period_ns;
> }
>
> - pwm_config(lp->pwm, duty, period);
> - if (duty)
> - pwm_enable(lp->pwm);
> - else
> - pwm_disable(lp->pwm);
> + pwm_get_state(lp->pwm, &state);
Should this be:
} else {
pwm_get_state(lp->pwm, &state);
}
As currently written this will clobber the state.period that was set
above.
Daniel.
> + pwm_set_relative_duty_cycle(&state, br, max_br);
> + state.enabled = state.duty_cycle;
> +
> + pwm_apply_state(lp->pwm, &state);
> }
>
> static int lp855x_bl_update_status(struct backlight_device *bl)
> --
> 2.31.1
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-02 16:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-01 13:19 [PATCH v4] backlight: lp855x: Switch to atomic PWM API Maíra Canal
2021-11-02 16:00 ` Daniel Thompson [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211102160000.kvi6hhhgdjowgnft@maple.lan \
--to=daniel.thompson@linaro.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jingoohan1@gmail.com \
--cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maira.canal@usp.br \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).