Linux Framebuffer Layer development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
To: javierm@redhat.com, deller@gmx.de, sashal@kernel.org,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
	Andreas Thalhammer <andreas.thalhammer-linux@gmx.net>,
	Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@leemhuis.info>,
	Zack Rusin <zackr@vmware.com>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>, Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>,
	Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
	Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>,
	Changcheng Deng <deng.changcheng@zte.com.cn>,
	Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
	Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] video/aperture: Call sysfb_disable() before removing PCI devices
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2022 16:44:48 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221026144448.424-1-tzimmermann@suse.de> (raw)

Call sysfb_disable() from aperture_remove_conflicting_pci_devices()
before removing PCI devices. Without, simpledrm can still bind to
simple-framebuffer devices after the hardware driver has taken over
the hardware. Both drivers interfere with each other and results are
undefined.

Reported modesetting errors [1] are shown below.

---- snap ----
rcu: INFO: rcu_sched detected expedited stalls on CPUs/tasks: { 13-.... } 7 jiffies s: 165 root: 0x2000/.
rcu: blocking rcu_node structures (internal RCU debug):
Task dump for CPU 13:
task:X               state:R  running task     stack:    0 pid: 4242 ppid:  4228 flags:0x00000008
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 ? commit_tail+0xd7/0x130
 ? drm_atomic_helper_commit+0x126/0x150
 ? drm_atomic_commit+0xa4/0xe0
 ? drm_plane_get_damage_clips.cold+0x1c/0x1c
 ? drm_atomic_helper_dirtyfb+0x19e/0x280
 ? drm_mode_dirtyfb_ioctl+0x10f/0x1e0
 ? drm_mode_getfb2_ioctl+0x2d0/0x2d0
 ? drm_ioctl_kernel+0xc4/0x150
 ? drm_ioctl+0x246/0x3f0
 ? drm_mode_getfb2_ioctl+0x2d0/0x2d0
 ? __x64_sys_ioctl+0x91/0xd0
 ? do_syscall_64+0x60/0xd0
 ? entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0xb5
 </TASK>
...
rcu: INFO: rcu_sched detected expedited stalls on CPUs/tasks: { 13-.... } 30 jiffies s: 169 root: 0x2000/.
rcu: blocking rcu_node structures (internal RCU debug):
Task dump for CPU 13:
task:X               state:R  running task     stack:    0 pid: 4242 ppid:  4228 flags:0x0000400e
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 ? memcpy_toio+0x76/0xc0
 ? memcpy_toio+0x1b/0xc0
 ? drm_fb_memcpy_toio+0x76/0xb0
 ? drm_fb_blit_toio+0x75/0x2b0
 ? simpledrm_simple_display_pipe_update+0x132/0x150
 ? drm_atomic_helper_commit_planes+0xb6/0x230
 ? drm_atomic_helper_commit_tail+0x44/0x80
 ? commit_tail+0xd7/0x130
 ? drm_atomic_helper_commit+0x126/0x150
 ? drm_atomic_commit+0xa4/0xe0
 ? drm_plane_get_damage_clips.cold+0x1c/0x1c
 ? drm_atomic_helper_dirtyfb+0x19e/0x280
 ? drm_mode_dirtyfb_ioctl+0x10f/0x1e0
 ? drm_mode_getfb2_ioctl+0x2d0/0x2d0
 ? drm_ioctl_kernel+0xc4/0x150
 ? drm_ioctl+0x246/0x3f0
 ? drm_mode_getfb2_ioctl+0x2d0/0x2d0
 ? __x64_sys_ioctl+0x91/0xd0
 ? do_syscall_64+0x60/0xd0
 ? entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0xb5
 </TASK>

The problem was added by commit 5e0137612430 ("video/aperture: Disable
and unregister sysfb devices via aperture helpers") to v6.0.3 and does
not exist in the mainline branch.

The mainline commit 5e0137612430 ("video/aperture: Disable and
unregister sysfb devices via aperture helpers") has been backported
from v6.0-rc1 to stable v6.0.3 from a larger patch series [2] that
reworks fbdev framebuffer ownership. The backport misses a change to
aperture_remove_conflicting_pci_devices(). Mainline itself is fine,
because the function does not exist there as a result of the patch
series.

Instead of backporting the whole series, fix the additional function.

v2:
	* expand justification for this fix (Greg)

Reported-by: Andreas Thalhammer <andreas.thalhammer-linux@gmx.net>
Reported-by: Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@leemhuis.info>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
Tested-by: Andreas Thalhammer <andreas.thalhammer-linux@gmx.net>
Fixes: cfecfc98a78d ("video/aperture: Disable and unregister sysfb devices via aperture helpers")
Cc: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
Cc: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>
Cc: Zack Rusin <zackr@vmware.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Cc: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Cc: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
Cc: Changcheng Deng <deng.changcheng@zte.com.cn>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v6.0.3+
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/d6afe54b-f8d7-beb2-3609-186e566cbfac@gmx.net/T/#t # [1]
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/106040/ # [2]
---
 drivers/video/aperture.c | 11 +++++++++++
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/video/aperture.c b/drivers/video/aperture.c
index d245826a9324..cc6427a091bc 100644
--- a/drivers/video/aperture.c
+++ b/drivers/video/aperture.c
@@ -338,6 +338,17 @@ int aperture_remove_conflicting_pci_devices(struct pci_dev *pdev, const char *na
 	resource_size_t base, size;
 	int bar, ret;
 
+	/*
+	 * If a driver asked to unregister a platform device registered by
+	 * sysfb, then can be assumed that this is a driver for a display
+	 * that is set up by the system firmware and has a generic driver.
+	 *
+	 * Drivers for devices that don't have a generic driver will never
+	 * ask for this, so let's assume that a real driver for the display
+	 * was already probed and prevent sysfb to register devices later.
+	 */
+	sysfb_disable();
+
 	/*
 	 * WARNING: Apparently we must kick fbdev drivers before vgacon,
 	 * otherwise the vga fbdev driver falls over.
-- 
2.38.0


             reply	other threads:[~2022-10-26 14:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-26 14:44 Thomas Zimmermann [this message]
2022-10-26 14:47 ` [PATCH v2] video/aperture: Call sysfb_disable() before removing PCI devices Greg KH

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20221026144448.424-1-tzimmermann@suse.de \
    --to=tzimmermann@suse.de \
    --cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
    --cc=andreas.thalhammer-linux@gmx.net \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=deller@gmx.de \
    --cc=deng.changcheng@zte.com.cn \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=javierm@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=mripard@kernel.org \
    --cc=regressions@leemhuis.info \
    --cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
    --cc=sashal@kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=thunder.leizhen@huawei.com \
    --cc=zackr@vmware.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox