From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C498E1C0DC6; Sun, 7 Apr 2024 08:49:37 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712479777; cv=none; b=R9zMLMnBpzxgn3nNTwx667qpre/0dJ4oI3EVNG8iPe/kkPApWXCV0fQPDFPp7m+YIyo9S0br2boXWH+KhaIqfwleJXrsc1bA9C4cOdhPdr3FmHYxzB9g2l9D76ikET6C+Qe80FrqaJNAUZ238UmkCo9jr4/PWqsZrsWbIE+mT2Q= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712479777; c=relaxed/simple; bh=9GexqZRzYwWDDWeEy+/lg6I4B9teFNss+7Iws8stJWo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=FRNPhzl80xt60vRLW6h0am30zK/3+GgkvG0OrpsUm7ASd8T/DoLBMvofTuRA7S1dYeciqrVObFbbJRbnMdabf+Yuyqk4FQWL9hz4aalOpyp4XvgTqoBNQkNjrNQeIBCNkgXYZg0uAsxVVpIN+PdQQjNBqDYRMNYv52ZyuJeYjVE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=SsYhQ30R; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="SsYhQ30R" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B894CC433F1; Sun, 7 Apr 2024 08:49:32 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1712479777; bh=9GexqZRzYwWDDWeEy+/lg6I4B9teFNss+7Iws8stJWo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=SsYhQ30RiNQ08UMek5dA4CNyvVWLNNLOpkEsyduifmK1Tj4XpLRA7LVTj2YkBDZXm N7VzP2/DszZcWNJWdLmA2CqdSWEXTAzNUlTq/TSjEANRYJ434Df6+129CUqRDVP7DN eBOQTNlDk9lZRGjvjHo3mMxetTDsvzrvfl8qiJ2t5enPne6X3kTA5g9tJCFUIAEElV d1W9EScb9v5p2WyGdUSWR27nfRbEus4VWc/L5Dn5ww2OmyxQpNBk77r/x9HroCKCu8 HJrvhoBs1p93fhFJek+k3PGtGkmy8k13ooNYdNqrwGRCebsszSc95EsJ0gTn4Z5ycQ tOkkQIJjbsJxQ== Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2024 09:49:29 +0100 From: Simon Horman To: Easwar Hariharan Cc: Edward Cree , Martin Habets , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , "open list:SFC NETWORK DRIVER" , "open list:SFC NETWORK DRIVER" , open list , Wolfram Sang , "open list:RADEON and AMDGPU DRM DRIVERS" , "open list:DRM DRIVERS" , "open list:INTEL DRM DISPLAY FOR XE AND I915 DRIVERS" , "open list:INTEL DRM DISPLAY FOR XE AND I915 DRIVERS" , "open list:DRM DRIVER FOR NVIDIA GEFORCE/QUADRO GPUS" , "open list:I2C SUBSYSTEM HOST DRIVERS" , "open list:BTTV VIDEO4LINUX DRIVER" , "open list:FRAMEBUFFER LAYER" Subject: Re: [PATCH v0 10/14] sfc: falcon: Make I2C terminology more inclusive Message-ID: <20240407084929.GX26556@kernel.org> References: <20240329170038.3863998-1-eahariha@linux.microsoft.com> <20240329170038.3863998-11-eahariha@linux.microsoft.com> <20240402082951.GG26556@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 12:17:26PM -0700, Easwar Hariharan wrote: > On 4/2/2024 1:29 AM, Simon Horman wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 05:00:34PM +0000, Easwar Hariharan wrote: > >> I2C v7, SMBus 3.2, and I3C specifications have replaced "master/slave" > >> with more appropriate terms. Inspired by and following on to Wolfram's > >> series to fix drivers/i2c/[1], fix the terminology for users of > >> I2C_ALGOBIT bitbanging interface, now that the approved verbiage exists > >> in the specification. > >> > >> Compile tested, no functionality changes intended > >> > >> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240322132619.6389-1-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com/ > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Easwar Hariharan > > > > Reviewed-by: Simon Horman > > > Thank you, Simon, for reviewing. I believe that we are settling on controller/target > terminology from feedback on the other drivers in this series. Would you want to re-review > v1 with that change, or should I add you R-B in v1 despite the change? Thanks for asking, either way is fine by me.